richary wrote:
Does the term in your search bar say "upjohn"
richary wrote:
Well actually yes. Which isn't as bad as it seems, I had been showing Anna the notes for a nearby park where I placed my first Sydney cache. Donated by the Upjohn Phamaraceutical Company and is called Upjohn Park.J_&_J wrote:Does the term in your search bar say "upjohn"
That's the one that isn't working for me.caughtatwork wrote:The default on entry is All Zones, All Names.
If I select All Zones, K I get list of zones starting with K.
That one is working fine. Strange one.If I select NSW NP&WS Managed Area and All Name I get bounced back to All Zones, All Names.
Is the last thing the problem?
When you have selected N with All Zones, what's in your address bar?richary wrote:That's the one that isn't working for me.caughtatwork wrote:The default on entry is All Zones, All Names.
If I select All Zones, K I get list of zones starting with K.
If I select All Zones, N (or any other letter) it comes back and tells me "No Zones Available".
Running Firefox 3.5.6 if that is relevant.
That one is working fine. Strange one.If I select NSW NP&WS Managed Area and All Name I get bounced back to All Zones, All Names.
Is the last thing the problem?
The data is presented as a pie chart as it will always be as at "today".sushilord wrote:Hi GCA fairies,
Would it be possible to produce a graph showing cache type/container size? Currently each is available as a pie chart.
Just a thought.
Many thanks
Looks exactly like that, and to doublecheck I copied the above into both FF and IE7 toolbars directly and got the same result - No Zones Found.caughtatwork wrote: When you have selected N with All Zones, what's in your address bar?
It should look like this.
http://geocaching.com.au/zone/?letter=N
Paste what you have and I'll see if I can work out what makes it not work at your end.
All working perfectly now! Thanks for that.caughtatwork wrote:Aha!
The GCA administrators have special privileges into the database to see as yet unapproved zones. All new zones go through a review process before they get approved.
As such the query that gets the data from the database is lightly different for the admins.
No worries. I know from those days how helpful the info from the end user can be, instead of just complaining that it doesn't workThanks for your persistence in providing the detail. It helped to narrow down the cause.
This what I came up with.sushilord wrote:C@W a PM is on its way.