Page 1 of 1

Locationless own-log etiquette

Posted: 08 May 22 8:44 pm
by Team737
We're new to locationless caches.... We published a few lately, and today spotted an object that would serve as a log for one.
What is the consensus for logging your own locationless cache? OK/not OK? Is there an official line?

Re: Locationless own-log etiquette

Posted: 09 May 22 9:39 am
by caughtatwork
My own opinion that when you hide a cache you shouldn't log a find against it because you know where it is. An exception is a moveable which can end up anywhere and as you no longer know where it is when you look for it, it's OK to log you own. Same for a locationless cache. You have found it in a new location, so you should be able to log it if you like.

Re: Locationless own-log etiquette

Posted: 09 May 22 7:38 pm
by Team737
caughtatwork wrote:
09 May 22 9:39 am
My own opinion that when you hide a cache you shouldn't log a find against it because you know where it is. An exception is a moveable which can end up anywhere and as you no longer know where it is when you look for it, it's OK to log you own. Same for a locationless cache. You have found it in a new location, so you should be able to log it if you like.
This was my line of thinking too, cheers....

Re: Locationless own-log etiquette

Posted: 10 May 22 5:21 am
by oldfella
Team737 wrote:
09 May 22 7:38 pm
caughtatwork wrote:
09 May 22 9:39 am
My own opinion that when you hide a cache you shouldn't log a find against it because you know where it is. An exception is a moveable which can end up anywhere and as you no longer know where it is when you look for it, it's OK to log you own. Same for a locationless cache. You have found it in a new location, so you should be able to log it if you like.
This was my line of thinking too, cheers....
Agree