not really, where are all the GCA finds?acts2youthgroup wrote:This will reveal all.
http://grand_high_pobah.home.comcast.net/Australia1.html
Your cache found number
- The Spindoctors
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: 08 October 03 8:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
- Team Piggy
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: 02 April 03 5:16 pm
- Location: South Australia
- J_&_J
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: 12 May 05 7:58 pm
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000016368307
- Location: Morphett Vale
- Contact:
As long as you know where you stand, who cares? Must admit I did go out to Ninnes Well hoping to see a piggy stamp somewhere but left dissapointed. I remember seeing one under the lid of Mr Burns Powerplant. Ooops! sorry for getting off topic!Team Piggy wrote:Crikey, mine was about 700 out! Maybe I need to log some of the finds !
- Team Piggy
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: 02 April 03 5:16 pm
- Location: South Australia
Sadly the Piggy stamp did a hiding act under one of the Pig-mobile seats for a few months, it reappeared the other day on a sudden harsh braking session!
Ninnes well, hmm, Yes that was about a month ago? maybe 2, With TGC in tow. Sadly only a pen log.. Maybe a Piggy face if you were lucky!Mr Burns, Crikey that would have been a while ago, did I log it ?? Who knows.
I just don't bother logging, Not about the points to me.
It's funny sometimes though when I forget a cache name and there has been a couple of almost double visits!
Ninnes well, hmm, Yes that was about a month ago? maybe 2, With TGC in tow. Sadly only a pen log.. Maybe a Piggy face if you were lucky!Mr Burns, Crikey that would have been a while ago, did I log it ?? Who knows.
I just don't bother logging, Not about the points to me.
It's funny sometimes though when I forget a cache name and there has been a couple of almost double visits!
- Shifter Brains
- 8500 or more caches found
- Posts: 125
- Joined: 04 September 05 5:57 pm
- Location: Gosford
More up to date than the actual poll at the start of this thread:
(C@W, there seems to have been a big increase in members all of a sudden! Wasn't that many cachers last time I looked at the graph.)
Those of you that pretend GCA caches don't exist, please disregard the rest of this post.
And the current Leaderboard:
(Give or take. Not up to the minute on GC finds but does take all into account.)
(C@W, there seems to have been a big increase in members all of a sudden! Wasn't that many cachers last time I looked at the graph.)
Those of you that pretend GCA caches don't exist, please disregard the rest of this post.
And the current Leaderboard:
(Give or take. Not up to the minute on GC finds but does take all into account.)
Last edited by Damo. on 18 November 06 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Actually get the right numbers of cachers is a harder task that you can possibly imagine.Damo. wrote:More up to date than the actual poll at the start of this thread:
(C@W, there seems to have been a big increase in members all of a sudden! Wasn't that many cachers last time I looked at the graph.)
Those of you that pretend GCA caches don't exist, please disregard the rest of this post.
And the current Leaderboard:
Is a cacher someone who has found a cache in Australia? (ie. loads of visitors).
Is a cacher someone who has found a PHYSICAL cache in Australia (ie. exclude locationless caches).
Is a cacher someone who has NEVER found a cache in Australia but who has worked out that they can load their "my finds" up to GCA and use all the cool functions and graphs and stats that aren't supplied on other sites?
Is a cacher someone who has never found a cache in Australia, doesn't know about the site, but somehow gets a log in GCA (supplied from elsewhere), because a genuine Aussie visited the UK and then loaded their GPX files containing all of the logs (including non-Aussie) that they found while they were away?
You see my dilema. I'm afraid it's as neat as I can reasonably get it.
I figured a few pq uploads were behind the spike in numbers.caughtatwork wrote:
Actually get the right numbers of cachers is a harder task that you can possibly imagine.
If the numbers there are including the last 5 logs of uploaded overseas cache finds I can understand the difficulty!
For the sake of just the cacher graphs, are you able to filter for people who have found at least one cache in Aust/NZ?
Pretty flattering when users of other cache listing sites are making use of features here not offered elsewhere. You'll be pinup boy for Geocaching statistic fans worldwide C@W.
Great work!