New Aussie reviewer?
New Aussie reviewer?
Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
- Apty
- 1350 or more caches found
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 23 May 08 2:55 pm
- Twitter: Apty
- Location: Kensington Gardens SA 5068
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
It sure looks that way by what they wrote.
I was only thinking on Saturday how big a job it must be for theUMP with so many caches being submitting each day.
I was only thinking on Saturday how big a job it must be for theUMP with so many caches being submitting each day.
-
- 8000 or more caches found
- Posts: 123
- Joined: 31 December 05 6:58 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook, NSW
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Reads that way.Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
"Indigenous astronomers: Tchingal – the emu in the sky."
Sound like someone?
- Big Matt and Shell
- 6500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
- Twitter: BigMattandShell
- Contact:
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Hmmm, very interesting.
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Just for the record, it's not only me! Ministro and i,riblit cover the most populous States.Apty wrote:I was only thinking on Saturday how big a job it must be for theUMP with so many caches being submitting each day.
- Marcus Vitruvius
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 297
- Joined: 23 July 07 12:35 pm
- Location: Newcastle, NSW
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
The only one I can think of to bestow that title upon is the legendary Dak's Emu Mob! RIP.canary wrote:Reads that way.Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
"Indigenous astronomers: Tchingal – the emu in the sky."
Sound like someone?
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: 09 December 07 7:08 pm
- Location: Lucas, Ballarat Victoria
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17016
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.Sol de Lune wrote:Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: 09 December 07 7:08 pm
- Location: Lucas, Ballarat Victoria
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....caughtatwork wrote:Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.Sol de Lune wrote:Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
- setsujoku
- 3500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1422
- Joined: 28 December 04 5:46 pm
- Twitter: BGNWP
- Location: Athelstone, SA
- Contact:
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?Sol de Lune wrote:Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....caughtatwork wrote:Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.Sol de Lune wrote:Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: 09 December 07 7:08 pm
- Location: Lucas, Ballarat Victoria
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
setsujoku wrote:The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?Sol de Lune wrote:Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....caughtatwork wrote:Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.Sol de Lune wrote:Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
Whichever.......It's a multi cache that was hidden back in 2007 and or traditional that was hidden in 2013.
I accept that a new reviewer has apparently published it......
Cache on......
Last edited by Sol de Lune on 26 March 13 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17016
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
That's why there's a new reviewer. That poor cache sat in the review queue for 6 years before it finally made it to publish statusSol de Lune wrote:setsujoku wrote:The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?Sol de Lune wrote:Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....caughtatwork wrote:Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.Sol de Lune wrote:Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
Whatever.....it's a multi cache that was hidden back in 2007 and or traditional that was hidden in 2013.
I'll accept that a new reviewer has apparently published it......
Cache on......
- Richary
- 8000 or more caches found
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
- Location: Waitara, Sydney
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Shame it's so far away, it would be a good one to get the stats up on the most "unloved"!
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: 09 December 07 7:08 pm
- Location: Lucas, Ballarat Victoria
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
I've only been caching since Oct 2007, so it's before my time anyway.......caughtatwork wrote:That's why there's a new reviewer. That poor cache sat in the review queue for 6 years before it finally made it to publish statusSol de Lune wrote:setsujoku wrote:The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?Sol de Lune wrote:Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....caughtatwork wrote:Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.Sol de Lune wrote:Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........Bunya wrote:Do we have a new Aussie reviewer "Tchingal"?
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... dd9cf15a60
Whatever.....it's a multi cache that was hidden back in 2007 and or traditional that was hidden in 2013.
I'll accept that a new reviewer has apparently published it......
Cache on......
-
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 727
- Joined: 08 August 09 12:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
anyone know who it is? (or is it like flight club?)
Also, I just noticed, my cache was commented on by "Hersien" so is there more than one?
Also, I just noticed, my cache was commented on by "Hersien" so is there more than one?