Is that the GeoPolice?noikmeister wrote: He also threatened to refer me to the police.
Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
- Yurt
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 01 May 09 10:08 pm
- Location: Northern Suburbs, Sydney
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
- Agent Basil
- 2500 or more caches found
- Posts: 674
- Joined: 31 July 08 8:26 pm
- Location: Deakin, ACT
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
So why haven't you deleted his log ?
- Bronnie_1990
- 1000 or more caches found
- Posts: 681
- Joined: 21 September 10 4:20 pm
- Twitter: bronnie1990
- Location: Tuggeranong, Canberra.
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
I would really love to know how this would work out in real life..noikmeister wrote: He also threatened to refer me to the police.
"Hello, police? Someone's asking me why i didnt sign a notepad inside a container, out in Namadgi! Hello? Where did you go? Did you hang up on me? Oh man"
- noikmeister
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
I'm just waiting for time to pass so the two events aren't connectedAgent Basil wrote:So why haven't you deleted his log ?
- Agent Basil
- 2500 or more caches found
- Posts: 674
- Joined: 31 July 08 8:26 pm
- Location: Deakin, ACT
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
Bronnie_1990 wrote:I would really love to know how this would work out in real life..noikmeister wrote: He also threatened to refer me to the police.
"Hello, police? Someone's asking me why i didnt sign a notepad inside a container, out in Namadgi! Hello? Where did you go? Did you hang up on me? Oh man"
- calumphing_four
- 1600 or more caches found
- Posts: 591
- Joined: 29 October 06 2:51 pm
- Location: Kidman Park
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
My 2c:
His log isn't a "TFTC" which I've noted in logs on other caches of yours, and at least provides some detail of his find, so why delete his log and not the "TFTC" logs too, as they didn't write about their experience?
- although it is pretty rude of them to reply the way they did when you politely pointed out the normal thing is to write in the log book.
Cheers
His log isn't a "TFTC" which I've noted in logs on other caches of yours, and at least provides some detail of his find, so why delete his log and not the "TFTC" logs too, as they didn't write about their experience?
- although it is pretty rude of them to reply the way they did when you politely pointed out the normal thing is to write in the log book.
Cheers
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
Just because you dont like what someone wrote (or did not write) in a online log does not give you the right to delete it under the GC guidelines however under the GC guidelines you can delete the log for not signing the logbook.calumphing_four wrote:so why delete his log and not the "TFTC" logs too, as they didn't write about their experience?
- noikmeister
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
What s/he said.covert wrote:Just because you dont like what someone wrote (or did not write) in a online log does not give you the right to delete it under the GC guidelines however under the GC guidelines you can delete the log for not signing the logbook.calumphing_four wrote:so why delete his log and not the "TFTC" logs too, as they didn't write about their experience?
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
I just checked, it is He.noikmeister wrote: What s/he said.
- pjmpjm
- 6000 or more caches found
- Posts: 864
- Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
- Twitter: Booroobin
- Location: Blue Mountains
- Contact:
Refusal to Sign Cache Log Book
I continue to think that this is an example of a confused and anti-social geocaching newbie.
As a once-off, I'd be inclined to forget about it.
If he/she continued to refuse to (physically) sign log books, then it would be a different matter.
A case study in human psychology . . .
As a once-off, I'd be inclined to forget about it.
If he/she continued to refuse to (physically) sign log books, then it would be a different matter.
A case study in human psychology . . .
- mtbikeroz
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 28 November 03 10:49 am
- Location: Canberra, ACT
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
I too got the same did not sign log from the same person Noikmeister & Agent Basil did.
I too got the *^&*%&*%^&* reply, and subsequent &*&*% (& police) reply.
But, in amongst the *^&*^^ and *(*(^& he said something about the cache vicinity that tweaked my memory. Firstly, the cache is a difficult Namadgi cache, well, an hours walk up a steep fire trail followed by a 5 mins bush bash rock navigate.
He mentioned things about the vicinity (& nicknames) that were there in 2003 or thereabouts, and these things featured in the previous cache up there by ,......, wait for it ........., Panic!. (that TankEngine may have remembered too).
That cache was archived in 2006, and those things up there long forgotten. (it was archived before this newish person came on the scene in 2009)
Then all of a sudden, up pops these things from the ACT's "interesting"" past.
So, I asked how he knew about this way back in 2003, and if he knew Panic!. Silence! Well, I suppose that's better than *^*&^*(^896896(*^*(^*(^anyday.
I didn't ask if he WAS Panic!, just if he knew.....
Still haven't deleted his log,.... still thinking .....
I too got the *^&*%&*%^&* reply, and subsequent &*&*% (& police) reply.
But, in amongst the *^&*^^ and *(*(^& he said something about the cache vicinity that tweaked my memory. Firstly, the cache is a difficult Namadgi cache, well, an hours walk up a steep fire trail followed by a 5 mins bush bash rock navigate.
He mentioned things about the vicinity (& nicknames) that were there in 2003 or thereabouts, and these things featured in the previous cache up there by ,......, wait for it ........., Panic!. (that TankEngine may have remembered too).
That cache was archived in 2006, and those things up there long forgotten. (it was archived before this newish person came on the scene in 2009)
Then all of a sudden, up pops these things from the ACT's "interesting"" past.
So, I asked how he knew about this way back in 2003, and if he knew Panic!. Silence! Well, I suppose that's better than *^*&^*(^896896(*^*(^*(^anyday.
I didn't ask if he WAS Panic!, just if he knew.....
Still haven't deleted his log,.... still thinking .....
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: 09 December 07 7:08 pm
- Location: Lucas, Ballarat Victoria
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
mtbikeroz wrote: and these things featured in the previous cache up there by ,......, wait for it ........., Panic!. (that TankEngine may have remembered too).
That cache was archived in 2006, and those things up there long forgotten. (it was archived before this newish person came on the scene in 2009)
Then all of a sudden, up pops these things from the ACT's "interesting"" past.
Surely not.....
- mtbikeroz
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 28 November 03 10:49 am
- Location: Canberra, ACT
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
YES. I haven't mentioned specifics or details, but his &&%*%&* response to me included terms, words, mentions of very very specific long gone things that only Panic! would know., AND, those same terms were in the cache listing by him.
- noikmeister
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
speaking of a study in human psychology...
- Big Matt and Shell
- 6500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
- Twitter: BigMattandShell
- Contact:
Re: Cachers who refuses to sign the log book
That's odd, I was only mentioning him today in reference to something else....
He did have a penchant for not signing logs.
He did have a penchant for not signing logs.