Should Archived Caches Count in dragonZone?

A place to talk about the Geocaching Australia dragonZone and other games

Should Archived Caches Count in dragonZone?

Poll ended at 05 July 16 11:40 am

Yes
7
35%
No
13
65%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
Zalgariath
5500 or more caches found
5500 or more caches found
Posts: 1749
Joined: 17 August 09 10:44 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Re: Should Archived Caches Count in dragonZone?

Post by Zalgariath » 13 July 16 8:30 am

A good game balance I think, now what you see on the map matches what the score is it will be more intuitive for new players and easier for existing player to keep track. \:D/

Sol de Lune
Posts: 1820
Joined: 09 December 07 7:08 pm
Location: Wright ACT

Re: Should Archived Caches Count in dragonZone?

Post by Sol de Lune » 15 July 16 4:06 pm

I took a snapshot of some of the standings prior to the finalisation of the vote, and as a result there are some interesting stats after the change in the status of archived caches. These are the approximate changes.....

GRIFFIN
Before the change
Caches controlled - 921
Zones controlled - 108

After the change
Caches controlled - 771 (down 150)
Zones Controlled - 97 (down 11)

PHOENIX
Before the change
Caches controlled - 828
Zones controlled - 114

After the change
Caches controlled - 754 (down 84)
Zones Controlled - 109 (down 5)

CERBERUS
Before the change
Caches controlled - 1410
Zones controlled - 145

After the change
Caches controlled - 1340 (down 70)
Zones Controlled - 147 (up 2)

MINOTAUR
Before the change
Caches controlled - 849
Zones controlled - 131

After the change
Caches controlled - 800 (down 49)
Zones Controlled - 138 (up 7)

So, looks like Minotaur did the best out of the exercise in picking up 7 zones while only losing 49 controlled caches.

Agree with Zal....what you see now on the map is now what is actually there....hopefully making it a little clearer for all to understand. Also agree with C&W....collectively we make a better game....

NEW PLAYERS.....COME ON DOWN !!!!!!

Post Reply