c@w or myself kill off the ones that we deem need killing (no container or obvious issue), otherwise we place a reviewer note and life goes on for that cacheBig Matt and Shell wrote:Mr Rat or C@W, what happens to these caches currently (or when the person(s) described in this post in in place)?richary wrote:I'm not proposing a system of GC style reviewers as someone suggested, but the reviewers that are being set up to clean up abandoned and missing caches could also (if the Senate decides) look at ones that are still there but getting SBA logs for this sort of reason.
There is a misconception that GCA does not archive caches. This hasn't been true for years. ALL SBA notes get reviewed. We just want other people to do it so we can concentrate on other stuff.