196 in a day.

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
User avatar
Mr Router
1500 or more caches found
1500 or more caches found
Posts: 2782
Joined: 22 May 05 11:59 am
Location: Bathurst

Post by Mr Router » 24 December 07 4:34 pm

the.pud wrote:....maybe another Oz caching record could soon fall to the NZers??
That has sealed it !

Moneydork
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 73
Joined: 01 November 04 8:06 pm
Location: Berri, South Australia

Post by Moneydork » 24 December 07 5:38 pm

Mr Router wrote: That has sealed it !
Maybe - but can you beat our record by the same margin that we beat the previous one? :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
pprass
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 911
Joined: 18 December 03 11:52 pm
Location: Port Macquarie

Post by pprass » 24 December 07 6:00 pm

Moneydork wrote:Maybe - but can you beat our record by the same margin that we beat the previous one? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Margin of 1 is all it takes :wink:

User avatar
Mr Router
1500 or more caches found
1500 or more caches found
Posts: 2782
Joined: 22 May 05 11:59 am
Location: Bathurst

Post by Mr Router » 24 December 07 6:00 pm

A velcro gloved challenge it seems :lol: :lol:

Moneydork
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 73
Joined: 01 November 04 8:06 pm
Location: Berri, South Australia

Post by Moneydork » 25 December 07 8:47 pm

pprass wrote: Margin of 1 is all it takes :wink:
True, but 200 caches in a day would be more impressive.

User avatar
Mr Router
1500 or more caches found
1500 or more caches found
Posts: 2782
Joined: 22 May 05 11:59 am
Location: Bathurst

Post by Mr Router » 25 December 07 9:00 pm

Moneydork wrote:
pprass wrote: Margin of 1 is all it takes :wink:
True, but 200 caches in a day would be more impressive.
Sure would be :wink:

User avatar
setsujoku
3500 or more caches found
3500 or more caches found
Posts: 1422
Joined: 28 December 04 5:46 pm
Twitter: BGNWP
Location: Athelstone, SA
Contact:

Post by setsujoku » 25 December 07 9:10 pm

What scared me more, was their nude up for smiley log :!: :D

rediguana
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 151
Joined: 03 May 03 12:56 pm
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Post by rediguana » 26 December 07 11:12 pm

It must be my turn to say thank you now. I had a blast in Australia for the trip, not just the raid, but also the caches in Melbourne, along the Great Ocean Road, Mt Gambier, Adelaide, the road to the Grampians, Ballarat and Melbourne again. For once it was great to be travelling with geocachers that weren't too concerned if someone said - shall we stop for the next cache? :twisted:

Can I recommend that if any Australians ever feel like setting a record in New Zealand, that Christchurch would be a good city to try, and unsurprisingly it is very similar to Adelaide (and sister city of course).

The raid itself was also fantastic fun. A shaky start but we soon got into a rhythm after 5-10 caches.

What I enjoyed most was the level of teamwork that was required. This was entirely unlike any other form of geocaching I've been involved in. A lot of planning and co-ordination was required. On the day I was nearly always first out of the van and last in. Being a scout meant I got plenty of quick finds. But it meant I also had to open the door and shut it a good 200+ times! I also had to check that we were all in - I only stuffed up once but someone else spotted the empty seat before we drove off.

I think that 220-250 could well be reachable. Our biggest problem was that we only had about 200 caches planned, and we thought we'd be lucky to reach it. As we checked our rate through the day we realised that we would in fact get close. The next team that has a go probably needs to plan for 250-300 caches!

It was also great having Ian as a driver - even if only because he used to live in Christchurch and it was good to catch up with him again! ;)

The social event the following day was also fun to meet up with a number of Adelaide cachers - its always great to meet more cachers. And of course the accidental meeting with shonkylogic that evening.

Of course, thanks must go to everyone that placed caches that we found on our trip. Without you it wouldn't have been possible.

The daunting part for me is that I still need to sit down and log 370+ finds from the trip, as well as a few DNFs... and, yes, the nudie cache... :D

Cheers Gav

User avatar
the.pud
1450 or more caches found
1450 or more caches found
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 March 05 1:20 pm
Location: NZ

Re: 196 in a day.

Post by the.pud » 25 July 09 11:52 am

Where has the caching Records page gone from the wiki?
I still need to see if the NZ team is still in front.
The below link that use to work doesn't any more, and i can find the info anywhere else?
Can anyone let me know.
http://wiki.geocaching.com.au/wiki/Caching_record

User avatar
CraigRat
850 or more found!!!
850 or more found!!!
Posts: 7015
Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Twitter: CraigRat
Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
Location: Launceston, TAS
Contact:

Re: 196 in a day.

Post by CraigRat » 25 July 09 12:09 pm

We are having a few issues with the wiki right now, it should be back up properly in the near future.
It is currently in a time warp and thinks it is in 2005 for some reason.

User avatar
CraigRat
850 or more found!!!
850 or more found!!!
Posts: 7015
Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Twitter: CraigRat
Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
Location: Launceston, TAS
Contact:

Re: 196 in a day.

Post by CraigRat » 25 July 09 12:54 pm


Moneydork
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 73
Joined: 01 November 04 8:06 pm
Location: Berri, South Australia

Re: 196 in a day.

Post by Moneydork » 25 July 09 1:33 pm

Thanks. I'm surprised that our record still holds, as we all finished believing that we could have done an additional 15 or 20 caches if we'd planned out more caches for the day (we ran out of planned caches as we didn't expect to be as successful as we were and so had to switch to "find nearest" for the final few hours of the record attempt.

Post Reply