River Deep Mountain High - Game Thread

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by caughtatwork » 11 June 07 10:19 am

tronador wrote:hi
For requirement no. 2 River Deep. Is gorge acceptable as in The Gorge?
Regrettably no, the name of the gorge does not appear in the cache name and I don't know whether a gorge is navigable as a waterway, so that might be an issue too.

User avatar
Dik:
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 370
Joined: 22 May 06 6:56 pm
Location: Adelaide SA Garmin 60CSx

Post by Dik: » 11 June 07 10:20 am

tronador wrote:hi
For requirement no. 2 River Deep. Is gorge acceptable as in The Gorge?
It works for "Onkaparinga River NP - THE GORGE" (GCW6KN)

Thinking of a trip to SA? :twisted:

User avatar
tronador
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 1555
Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW

Post by tronador » 11 June 07 3:55 pm

caughtatwork wrote:
tronador wrote:hi
For requirement no. 2 River Deep. Is gorge acceptable as in The Gorge?
Regrettably no, the name of the gorge does not appear in the cache name and I don't know whether a gorge is navigable as a waterway, so that might be an issue too.
OK no problem, and Dik no not planning on a trip to SA but sounds like a nice idea!

User avatar
tronador
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 1555
Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW

Post by tronador » 16 June 07 11:06 pm

Trying to finish the requirements during Sydney's wildest weather and flooding in 43 years has been rather interesting and a challenge in itself.

How about requirement no. 36 Cache in a storm.- wait for the worst weather on record, drive in atrocious road conditions to an access point, risk life and limb to get to GZ and hope the the cache has not been washed away.

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by caughtatwork » 16 June 07 11:21 pm

There's one with a greater than 80% chance of getting wet. It doesn't actually apply to rain, but hey, good to see you getting into the spirit.

User avatar
tronador
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 1555
Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW

Post by tronador » 16 June 07 11:37 pm

caughtatwork wrote:There's one with a greater than 80% chance of getting wet. It doesn't actually apply to rain, but hey, good to see you getting into the spirit.
Does that mean I can now use 17 Water cache, log a find on just about any cache, as most caches will see me approach on foot with a (good)??? chance of getting wet. Try a certainty! Most caches now have a mandatory fording across some sort of raging torrent. see my notes on GC11EE7 and GCM1JT. Good for a bit of a laugh!!!! :D :shock:
:idea: If I return with my surfboard will this count :?: :!: :twisted:

swampgecko
It's all in how you get there....
It's all in how you get there....
Posts: 2185
Joined: 28 March 03 6:00 pm

Post by swampgecko » 17 June 07 12:11 am

caughtatwork wrote:There's one with a greater than 80% chance of getting wet. It doesn't actually apply to rain, but hey, good to see you getting into the spirit.
And to think I wasted my wet days inside playing on the playstation, when I could have been out risking life and limb to find a hunk of plastic in the pouring rain........

DAMN!!!!!!!

User avatar
McPhan
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 725
Joined: 10 September 06 4:35 pm
Location: Holt ACT

Post by McPhan » 18 June 07 9:53 pm

I may have posted my last requirement for this game (depending on interpretation) and would like to take the time to thank all those responsible for putting this together.

Of course I wasted way too much time planning, but hey, it's caching and it's all good.

Thanks guys (and gals), I had a ball.

User avatar
TNLNSL
Posts: 4
Joined: 17 June 07 4:05 pm
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: thanks!

Post by TNLNSL » 19 June 07 2:00 pm

McPhan wrote:I may have posted my last requirement for this game (depending on interpretation) and would like to take the time to thank all those responsible for putting this together.

Of course I wasted way too much time planning, but hey, it's caching and it's all good.

Thanks guys (and gals), I had a ball.
I'll second the thanks. The game is interesting and well run. We had a somewhat similar contest in Oregon last year that involved visiting the highest-rated (difficulty plus terrain) caches in all 36 counties and it was a bit rough compared to this smooth-running operation. Good job! Now, I have 4 more caches to find.

User avatar
homedg
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
Posts: 798
Joined: 24 February 06 3:15 pm
Location: South West Sydney

Post by homedg » 19 June 07 8:09 pm

Just wondering how "ineligible" players will affect the final placements
eg I don't complete 20 requirements
I am in 38th position on the posted ladder
There are 3 ineligible cachers ahead of me on the ladder.

Am I deemed to have finished in 38th or 35th for the purpose of the comp?

Geocaching - It's not about the numbers.
RDMH - It's not about the prizes

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by caughtatwork » 19 June 07 8:27 pm

What number is next to your name?

Game players who are marked Ineligible are family members of the games administrators and who are playing for fun. Their positions on the ladder do not affect any prize positionings.

eg.

1 Derringer
2 PIRATE63
3 McPhan
4 womblywoo
Ineligible GabGab
5 Robmc

So Robmc would finish in 5th place, even though GabGab finished ahead. GabGab doesn't get a finishing position and as such doesn't affect the prize positions.

User avatar
homedg
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
Posts: 798
Joined: 24 February 06 3:15 pm
Location: South West Sydney

Post by homedg » 19 June 07 8:42 pm

DOH :!:
Never noticed that the ineligible participants didn't get ranked :oops:
hey, that means I'm even further down the list than I thought. Might have to take the Tronador approach and challenge storm and tempest to post a few more find requirements :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
sog n paulus
700 or more Caches found
700 or more Caches  found
Posts: 55
Joined: 01 March 06 6:15 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

Requirement 2 River Deep

Post by sog n paulus » 21 June 07 11:38 am

Sorry if someone has already asked this question but do the words falls, fallen or fell refering to water falls qualify for requirement 2 River Deep?
Thanks Sog.

User avatar
fehrgo
200 or more found
200 or more found
Posts: 447
Joined: 11 July 06 12:39 am
Location: Redland Bay, QLD

Post by fehrgo » 22 June 07 4:20 am

I think the idea was it needed to be a navigable waterway, so a falls would likely be out, but I'm really just guessing :P

User avatar
Cached
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found
Posts: 3087
Joined: 24 March 04 4:32 pm
Location: Launceston, Tasmania
Contact:

Post by Cached » 22 June 07 9:34 am

What he said.

Post Reply