Repairing caches (not your own)
- nomad_penguin
- 2000 or more caches found
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 28 August 06 10:49 pm
- Location: SA
Repairing caches (not your own)
Sincere apologies if this has been discussed before - I looked and looked, but couldn't find anything.
We may cache out in the bush this weekend in locations that are visited very seldomly. When reading the cache pages in preparation, I have noticed that some of the caches need repair, and have needed repair for quite a while.
In the past I have had no problem dropping off another pen, or adding an extra log book when the old one has become full. However, I feel a bit funny about replacing a container, even if it really needs it. I guess this is because I probably won't have exactly the same container and it feels a bit like meddling with someone else's property!
Any hints? It would be much appreciated. It seems a shame not to help maintain far away caches, but I want to do it in the right (acceptable) way.
Cheers
- nomad
We may cache out in the bush this weekend in locations that are visited very seldomly. When reading the cache pages in preparation, I have noticed that some of the caches need repair, and have needed repair for quite a while.
In the past I have had no problem dropping off another pen, or adding an extra log book when the old one has become full. However, I feel a bit funny about replacing a container, even if it really needs it. I guess this is because I probably won't have exactly the same container and it feels a bit like meddling with someone else's property!
Any hints? It would be much appreciated. It seems a shame not to help maintain far away caches, but I want to do it in the right (acceptable) way.
Cheers
- nomad
- Spruce Mooses
- 1000 or more caches found
- Posts: 428
- Joined: 04 July 05 4:06 pm
- Location: Spotswood, Vic
- Contact:
I've replaced entire containers and had mine replaced. I was really greatful that it was done, it certainly saved me the cache maintenance journey.
When I re-hid the cache that I replaced, I took photos of the new container and the hide to make sure they knew what it was all ok.
If it's a cache you think is worth it then sure, replace it and send a note to the owner. If you think it would be better archived then let them know that way too.
When I re-hid the cache that I replaced, I took photos of the new container and the hide to make sure they knew what it was all ok.
If it's a cache you think is worth it then sure, replace it and send a note to the owner. If you think it would be better archived then let them know that way too.
- Richary
- 8000 or more caches found
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
- Location: Waitara, Sydney
I've replaced some off my own back when I have found they need it if I had a spare container handy. Or if I have let it be known I am going somewhere have been asked to do so beforehand.
If you know which ones you are targetting and which might need a repair job, you could always email the owner first and ask if they would like you to replace it. In which case they might even arrange to meet you before with a spare container.
If you know which ones you are targetting and which might need a repair job, you could always email the owner first and ask if they would like you to replace it. In which case they might even arrange to meet you before with a spare container.
-
- 4000 or more? I'm officially obsessed.
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 01 April 04 2:01 pm
- Location: Rowville, Victoria
<p>Ditto.Spruce Mooses wrote:I've replaced entire containers and had mine replaced. I was really greatful that it was done, it certainly saved me the cache maintenance journey.
<p>Balance of post deleted.
Last edited by Rabbitto on 09 November 06 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17016
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Replacing missing caches is very commendable. I don't think people should then be claiming a find on it!
Also doing it with archived caches is not a good idea!
There was some confusion with a local cache a few months ago. The first wp was at the same coords as a cache which had been archived a couple of years previously after it had been lost. The last "finder" of the archived cache had put out a replacement which the owners hadn't removed. (They had archived it several months earlier) The new multi had been active for over a year before a few people started logging that they had found the cache at wp1!
Also doing it with archived caches is not a good idea!
There was some confusion with a local cache a few months ago. The first wp was at the same coords as a cache which had been archived a couple of years previously after it had been lost. The last "finder" of the archived cache had put out a replacement which the owners hadn't removed. (They had archived it several months earlier) The new multi had been active for over a year before a few people started logging that they had found the cache at wp1!
- Dik:
- 500 or more caches logged
- Posts: 370
- Joined: 22 May 06 6:56 pm
- Location: Adelaide SA Garmin 60CSx
I have replaced more existing cache containers than put out new ones of my own.
If earlier logs have requested a new container I try to make a point of having something suitable with me.
I also always carry a supply of extra large zip top bags with me, they make excellent emergency cache liners. And a small towel to dry out wet containers and/or contents.
If the previous two methods aren't appropriate and the cache doesn't look like surviving I will try to make up a suitable container and contents from what's on hand.
But under no circumstances will I replace a container if I couldn't find the identifiable remains of the previous one. That's just logged as a DNF.
If earlier logs have requested a new container I try to make a point of having something suitable with me.
I also always carry a supply of extra large zip top bags with me, they make excellent emergency cache liners. And a small towel to dry out wet containers and/or contents.
If the previous two methods aren't appropriate and the cache doesn't look like surviving I will try to make up a suitable container and contents from what's on hand.
But under no circumstances will I replace a container if I couldn't find the identifiable remains of the previous one. That's just logged as a DNF.
-
- 250 or more caches found
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 09 April 03 4:15 am
- Location: UK, and Perth, WA from time to time
- Contact:
Yeah, all sorts of scope for confusion there. I'd figure that replacing the container of a cache you've found but don't own is OK provided you're doing a more-or-less like-for-like swap, but if you don't know for certain exactly where the old container was hidden then you're in no position to hide a new one.Damo. wrote:Replacing missing caches is very commendable. I don't think people should then be claiming a find on it!