Should you say whether your bearings are true or magnetic?

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.

Should you say whether your bearings are true or magnetic?

No
2
5%
Yes
32
73%
Screw 'em, let 'em work it out for themselves
6
14%
The difference is inconsequential
4
9%
 
Total votes: 44

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Should you say whether your bearings are true or magnetic?

Post by caughtatwork » 27 January 06 10:16 pm

When you come across a cache that expects you to walk a number of meters in a direction do you expect that the direction should be given a true or magnetic?

I've lost count of the number of caches that I've tried (and eventually succeeded at) where there is no indication of whether the direction is true or magnetic.

So, I thought I'd ask to see whether it actually matters much and whether or not you should drop a note to the cache owner asking to update the page with a true or magnetic reference.

User avatar
GIN51E
600 or more caches found
600 or more caches found
Posts: 774
Joined: 19 June 05 11:07 am
Location: Berowra GARMIN GPSMAP66i

Post by GIN51E » 27 January 06 10:35 pm

never thought about this but it does make sense.

if your talking about something 10m away i don't think it makes a difference but if your talking about something a 100m or more away then i think it may become important in that case yes i think it should be indicated.

i guess the standard should be magnetic, because those cachers with a hand held compass only get magnetic where a GPS user often has the option of either two.

User avatar
Geodes
Posts: 345
Joined: 22 April 05 5:52 pm
Location: Mitcham, Vic

Post by Geodes » 27 January 06 10:58 pm

A typical difference between true and magnetic of 10&deg will result in nearly 18m difference at 100m - I think the answer here should be obvious :shock:

User avatar
embi
400 or more spectacular views seen
400 or more spectacular views seen
Posts: 1698
Joined: 02 April 03 2:09 pm
Location: Wyndham Vale
Contact:

Post by embi » 27 January 06 11:00 pm

Depends.... is it a true cache or a magnetic micro?? :D

SNIFTER
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 764
Joined: 05 April 03 5:40 pm
Location: Share Hounddogs Kennel in Sydney

Post by SNIFTER » 27 January 06 11:58 pm

Just why do you need to mention if it is north south east or west. This is caching not map reading . In thought that using a gps was the way to find things. If I wanted to use a compass I would have stayed in the scouts.

User avatar
GIN51E
600 or more caches found
600 or more caches found
Posts: 774
Joined: 19 June 05 11:07 am
Location: Berowra GARMIN GPSMAP66i

Post by GIN51E » 28 January 06 12:07 am

SNIFTER wrote:Just why do you need to mention if it is north south east or west. This is caching not map reading . In thought that using a gps was the way to find things. If I wanted to use a compass I would have stayed in the scouts.
just the first example that came to mind
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... 4d49c92c38

although it is listed as a Traditional :!: :?

i'm planning a mystery cache in which you may require some map and compass reading skills :D

xf king
650 or more caches found
650 or more caches found
Posts: 243
Joined: 01 October 04 9:06 pm
Location: Springvale Melbourne Australia

Post by xf king » 28 January 06 2:24 am

I think it would be a good idea to stay with a magnetic reference, as on the rarest of occasions I have used a old compass to follow a bearing when I had very bad reception... A compass follows the magnetic reference and so should anything else based upon a bearing

User avatar
TeamAstro
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 625
Joined: 01 April 04 10:57 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Post by TeamAstro » 28 January 06 11:01 am

You must. Depends if you want it to be found or not. You may not need to state it if you say, using a compass, take a bearing...

Look at my VECTOR cache. Could you find that without that info? See the pic associated with the gun on the page!

clear skies, Astro.

SNIFTER
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 764
Joined: 05 April 03 5:40 pm
Location: Share Hounddogs Kennel in Sydney

Post by SNIFTER » 28 January 06 11:30 am

'i'm planning a mystery cache in which you may require some map and compass reading skills'

You can bet we won't do it.

The Coffee's
4500 or more caches found
4500 or more caches found
Posts: 706
Joined: 20 March 04 10:34 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by The Coffee's » 28 January 06 12:24 pm

As a rule of thumb if a magnetic compass is required it is M....... North :shock: , and base any caches that require compass to be Magnetic North. However the difference will be revealed shortly :twisted: :evil:

User avatar
Papa Bear_Left
800 or more hollow logs searched
800 or more hollow logs searched
Posts: 2573
Joined: 03 April 03 12:28 am
Location: Kalamunda, WA
Contact:

Post by Papa Bear_Left » 28 January 06 1:55 pm

SNIFTER wrote:Just why do you need to mention if it is north south east or west. This is caching not map reading . In thought that using a gps was the way to find things. If I wanted to use a compass I would have stayed in the scouts.
I wonder if one of you clever programmer chappies could come up with some sort of macro that would insert a "But that's not geocaching; _real_ geocaching is following the arrow to where the box is hidden under the bush or rock!" post whenever a thread came up that mentioned any of the keywords "mystery", "puzzle", "compass", etc.

It'd save Snifter a lot of typing...

SNIFTER
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 764
Joined: 05 April 03 5:40 pm
Location: Share Hounddogs Kennel in Sydney

Post by SNIFTER » 28 January 06 2:47 pm

Thanks Bear. :D Love it.

User avatar
GIN51E
600 or more caches found
600 or more caches found
Posts: 774
Joined: 19 June 05 11:07 am
Location: Berowra GARMIN GPSMAP66i

Post by GIN51E » 28 January 06 3:00 pm

SNIFTER wrote: This is caching not map reading . In thought that using a gps was the way to find things.
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... ?wp=GCD35D

http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... ?wp=GCC715

http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... ?wp=GCC92F


The last one is even listed as a Traditional :!:

SNIFTER
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 764
Joined: 05 April 03 5:40 pm
Location: Share Hounddogs Kennel in Sydney

Post by SNIFTER » 28 January 06 3:53 pm

Sorry to tell you but at no time did we use a compass for those caches nor did we say use a compass. We use a GPS.

User avatar
GIN51E
600 or more caches found
600 or more caches found
Posts: 774
Joined: 19 June 05 11:07 am
Location: Berowra GARMIN GPSMAP66i

Post by GIN51E » 28 January 06 6:50 pm

SNIFTER wrote:Sorry to tell you but at no time did we use a compass for those caches nor did we say use a compass. We use a GPS.
did i say compass :?:

yet it is a form of map reading and the GPS doesn't help much in getting to the first WP



i'll end it there,

Post Reply