Needs Archiving log
- spatialriq
- 5500 or more caches found
- Posts: 326
- Joined: 12 May 11 11:52 pm
- Location: Perth
Needs Archiving log
Just out of interest, what's the process of logging a "Needs Archiving" log?
I placed a NA on a cache about 7 weeks ago after several DNF's. Just wondering when it gets archived. I know in GC it's generally a 30 days wait.
I placed a NA on a cache about 7 weeks ago after several DNF's. Just wondering when it gets archived. I know in GC it's generally a 30 days wait.
- CraigRat
- 850 or more found!!!
- Posts: 7015
- Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
- Twitter: CraigRat
- Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
- Location: Launceston, TAS
- Contact:
Re: Needs Archiving log
At GCA it's 'When we remember to check'
- gmj3191
- 7500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: 22 April 03 12:37 am
- Location: Sandringham, Vic Garmin Oregon 650
Re: Needs Archiving log
The gc.com process is within a day or three a reviewer issues a Post Reviewer Note that the cache will be archived if not maintained within 30 days, and after that it gets archived if there's no response from the CO.
In the Ministro - Bunjil world this usually happens in a pretty timely way from what I've seen.
I've never quite come to grips with the grammar used to describe the log types.
Needs Archived ..... Shouldn't this really be Needs Archiving?
Post Reviewer Note .. Shouldn't this be Post Review Note or Reviewer Note or something similar?
Funny Americans.
In the Ministro - Bunjil world this usually happens in a pretty timely way from what I've seen.
I've never quite come to grips with the grammar used to describe the log types.
Needs Archived ..... Shouldn't this really be Needs Archiving?
Post Reviewer Note .. Shouldn't this be Post Review Note or Reviewer Note or something similar?
Funny Americans.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Needs Archiving log
Nothing in the GCA queue
- Yurt
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 01 May 09 10:08 pm
- Location: Northern Suburbs, Sydney
Re: Needs Archiving log
It's almost as though they KNOW it's wrong but are too stubborn to admit it and change it to something grammatically correct. In what universe could "needs archived" ever be correct?gmj3191 wrote: I've never quite come to grips with the grammar used to describe the log types.
Needs Archived ..... Shouldn't this really be Needs Archiving?
Funny Americans.
A bit like the way they call main courses 'entrees' over there. Surely they know they are wrong.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Needs Archiving log
With the GPX format as it is and everyone parsing it incorrectly the textual descriptions of the log types are set in concrete now and forever. A rush job that has not served the community well.
- spatialriq
- 5500 or more caches found
- Posts: 326
- Joined: 12 May 11 11:52 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Needs Archiving log
Not now. Thankscaughtatwork wrote:Nothing in the GCA queue
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Needs Archiving log
I didn't do anything. Must have been a different faerie.spatialriq wrote:Not now. Thankscaughtatwork wrote:Nothing in the GCA queue