Page 1 of 2
New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 2:45 pm
by Bunya
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 2:51 pm
by Apty
It sure looks that way by what they wrote.
I was only thinking on Saturday how big a job it must be for theUMP with so many caches being submitting each day.
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 3:32 pm
by canary
Reads that way.
"Indigenous astronomers: Tchingal – the emu in the sky."
Sound like someone?
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 5:30 pm
by Big Matt and Shell
Hmmm, very interesting.
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 5:42 pm
by theUMP
Apty wrote:I was only thinking on Saturday how big a job it must be for theUMP with so many caches being submitting each day.
Just for the record, it's not only me! Ministro and i,riblit cover the most populous States.
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 6:43 pm
by Marcus Vitruvius
canary wrote:
Reads that way.
"Indigenous astronomers: Tchingal – the emu in the sky."
Sound like someone?
The only one I can think of to bestow that title upon is the legendary Dak's Emu Mob! RIP.
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 8:52 pm
by Sol de Lune
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 9:01 pm
by caughtatwork
Sol de Lune wrote:
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 9:18 pm
by Sol de Lune
caughtatwork wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.
Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 9:40 pm
by setsujoku
Sol de Lune wrote:caughtatwork wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.
Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....
The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 10:17 pm
by Sol de Lune
setsujoku wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:caughtatwork wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.
Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....
The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?
Whichever.......It's a multi cache that was hidden back in 2007 and or traditional that was hidden in 2013.
I accept that a new reviewer has apparently published it......
Cache on......
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 10:24 pm
by caughtatwork
Sol de Lune wrote:setsujoku wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:caughtatwork wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.
Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....
The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?
Whatever.....it's a multi cache that was hidden back in 2007 and or traditional that was hidden in 2013.
I'll accept that a new reviewer has apparently published it......
Cache on......
That's why there's a new reviewer. That poor cache sat in the review queue for 6 years before it finally made it to publish status
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 10:51 pm
by Richary
Shame it's so far away, it would be a good one to get the stats up on the most "unloved"!
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 11:01 pm
by Sol de Lune
caughtatwork wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:setsujoku wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:caughtatwork wrote:Sol de Lune wrote:
Published on 25 Jan 2007, by a new reviewer (????) and hasn't been found!!! How does that work........
Hidden in 2007, published in 2013.
Yep, agree.....hidden in 2007, published in 2013...and our 'new' reviewer picks it up. Ok....
The description of the cache says that it used to be a multi, but the owner couldn't convert it, so they have listed a new one. The new traditional has just been back dated to when the container was originally placed for the multi?
Whatever.....it's a multi cache that was hidden back in 2007 and or traditional that was hidden in 2013.
I'll accept that a new reviewer has apparently published it......
Cache on......
That's why there's a new reviewer. That poor cache sat in the review queue for 6 years before it finally made it to publish status
I've only been caching since Oct 2007, so it's before my time anyway.......
Re: New Aussie reviewer?
Posted: 25 March 13 11:18 pm
by LouiseAnn
anyone know who it is? (or is it like flight club?)
Also, I just noticed, my cache was commented on by "Hersien" so is there more than one?