Is it just me?

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
User avatar
noikmeister
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 1200
Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Is it just me?

Post by noikmeister » 09 January 13 1:56 pm

From the OP. Take context with your vehemence.
noikmeister wrote:I understand that it is totally none of my business and that I am being petulant

User avatar
Agent Basil
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found
Posts: 673
Joined: 31 July 08 8:26 pm
Location: Deakin, ACT

Re: Is it just me?

Post by Agent Basil » 09 January 13 2:44 pm

noikmeister wrote:From the OP. Take context with your vehemence.
noikmeister wrote:I understand that it is totally none of my business and that I am being petulant
And so what ????????? your disclaimer makes absolute no sense. Why post ?

Stand by for my next cache hide !

User avatar
noikmeister
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 1200
Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Is it just me?

Post by noikmeister » 09 January 13 3:38 pm

Agent Basil wrote:
noikmeister wrote:From the OP. Take context with your vehemence.
noikmeister wrote:I understand that it is totally none of my business and that I am being petulant
And so what ????????? your disclaimer makes absolute no sense. Why post ?

Stand by for my next cache hide !
To answer your question: I was just trying to find out if anyone else found it annoying.

Things annoy people all the time. Just because someone expresses their annoyance it doesn't mean "and by the way I think you are an idiot for doing it and I don't like you". Just that it annoys me that more and more people are naming their caches that way. It doesn't say anything about what I think of you as a person or attempt to be offensive in any way.

The disclaimer says exactly what Matt said. People can do whatever they want. Plus it says I understand that it is really none of my business. I also acknowledge that my annoyance has no basis in fact or even reasonableness and therefore I apologise if my annoyance make you choose to take offence. That too is out of my control and totally under your control. You choose to be offended. You choose to deride me just for expressing an opinion that is contrary to one of your practices. The disclaimer obviously doesn't do a very good job.

Notice that my annoyance doesn't stop me from doing any of your caches. It doesn't stop me from writing a nice log acknowledging how much I enjoyed the experience, instead of "TFTC". It doesn't stop me from going caching with you on multiple occasions and enjoying your company.

If you really want to get down to it, it doesn't even annoy me that you name your caches that way. What annoys me is the increasing number of people who are doing exactly the same thing. Once again, their business, not mine, but still annoying nonetheless.

So out of all this I got two or three people who agreed for practical reasons and a bunch of people saying that I should be ashamed of myself for expressing annoyance at something trivial.

User avatar
Agent Basil
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found
Posts: 673
Joined: 31 July 08 8:26 pm
Location: Deakin, ACT

Re: Is it just me?

Post by Agent Basil » 09 January 13 3:49 pm

Mr Norky, as discussed privately, no offence taken.

However, it reminds me of when I did my counselling training. If someone says during a discussion, "Don't take offence but ............" whatever follows the "but" is going to cause offence. The preclaimer doesn't make a jot of difference!

Now, shut up and give me a hug you big boofhead ! :D

User avatar
allrounder
3500 or more caches found
3500 or more caches found
Posts: 365
Joined: 19 January 06 2:38 pm
Location: Kambah

Re: Is it just me?

Post by allrounder » 09 January 13 4:00 pm

I get disappointed when I see a cache title using alliteration and it isn't one of Tankengine's....

User avatar
Agent Basil
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found
Posts: 673
Joined: 31 July 08 8:26 pm
Location: Deakin, ACT

Re: Is it just me?

Post by Agent Basil » 09 January 13 4:07 pm

allrounder wrote:I get disappointed when I see a cache title using alliteration and it isn't one of Tankengine's....
Blooming heck, I hadn't noticed............until now ! =D> =D>

User avatar
gmj3191
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 1314
Joined: 22 April 03 12:37 am
Location: Sandringham, Vic Garmin Oregon 650

Re: Is it just me?

Post by gmj3191 » 09 January 13 4:34 pm

Mr Router wrote:
Big Matt and Shell wrote:At the end of the day cache owners will name their caches what they want to as it's their right.

=D> well said
Well, maybe, but if it was suggested to them a different format (which they hadn't thought about) might be a good idea, they may choose to adopt it.
This might be outside a reviewer's scope, but I would have thought part of the role of a reviewer might be to pass on the wisdom they have gained over the years to less experienced or less thoughtful cachers.
Similarly, I think obvious spelling errors in listings, especially titles, doesn't reflect well on anybody involved in caching, and would it be so bad to ask the cacher if he wants to correct it?

User avatar
noikmeister
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 1200
Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Is it just me?

Post by noikmeister » 09 January 13 4:40 pm

Agent Basil wrote:
allrounder wrote:I get disappointed when I see a cache title using alliteration and it isn't one of Tankengine's....
Blooming heck, I hadn't noticed............until now ! =D> =D>
Me either. One day I was chatting with MBO about a newly published cache that I assumed to be a TE one and he said it couldn't be since it wasn't alliterated. I had never noticed.

He is slipping up though. Recently a couple have been alliterated in letter but not in sound. Tsk. Tsk. [-X

User avatar
FelixII
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 260
Joined: 12 December 10 9:12 pm
Location: Pearsall WA

Re: Is it just me?

Post by FelixII » 10 January 13 12:45 am



Mr Router wrote:


Big Matt and Shell wrote:
At the end of the day cache owners will name their caches what they want to as it's their right.


well said



Well, maybe, but if it was suggested to them a different format (which they hadn't thought about) might be a good idea, they may choose to adopt it.
This might be outside a reviewer's scope, but I would have thought part of the role of a reviewer might be to pass on the wisdom they have gained over the years to less experienced or less thoughtful cachers.
Similarly, I think obvious spelling errors in listings, especially titles, doesn't reflect well on anybody involved in caching, and would it be so bad to ask the cacher if he wants to correct it?

+1

But let's all remember it's a game and whilst we personally may get annoyed or let's say bothered it's still a game and we play for ENJOYMENT! \:D/

covert
150 or more caches found
150 or more caches found
Posts: 476
Joined: 30 July 08 11:47 am
Location: VIC

Re: Is it just me?

Post by covert » 10 January 13 9:19 am

Yep bugs the pants of me to. It is the shame the only solution is 3rd party tools that have to massage the data. Still no solution of Live data based caching.

User avatar
noikmeister
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 1200
Joined: 10 July 09 12:29 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Is it just me?

Post by noikmeister » 10 January 13 9:21 am

covert wrote:Still no solution of Live data based caching.
What do you mean by this? Having your GPS "online"

covert
150 or more caches found
150 or more caches found
Posts: 476
Joined: 30 July 08 11:47 am
Location: VIC

Re: Is it just me?

Post by covert » 10 January 13 9:36 am

noikmeister wrote:
covert wrote:Still no solution of Live data based caching.
What do you mean by this? Having your GPS "online"
Any of the Apps on Phones, Geocaching, CacheSense, NeoGeo, GACacher, GeocachingForLocus etc.

User avatar
honeysucker
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 109
Joined: 30 July 08 12:31 pm
Location: Windsor Gardens

Re: Is it just me?

Post by honeysucker » 10 January 13 10:29 am

As i have put out a large series i hear what you say, that the unique title is lost but this happens so often with any cache of a long name so it really dosnt make that much difference, if your doing a long series your usually just looking at the next cache anyway.

@Leighside you missed one You cant forget the OZ Mega 2014 Series 174 caches

User avatar
Pesky!
1350 or more caches found
1350 or more caches found
Posts: 1871
Joined: 04 April 03 11:48 pm
Location: Umina Beach, NSW

Re: Is it just me?

Post by Pesky! » 10 January 13 12:51 pm

this is a responce to the thread in general....

it sounds like this suggestion is to standardize and take the creativity out of this sport, even more than it already has.
why not just go back to using GCnnnn and GAnnnn codes in your cache names. do not allow anyone to call their hide anything other than the generated code.
that way no one gets confused,and the game die out from blandness.

User avatar
allrounder
3500 or more caches found
3500 or more caches found
Posts: 365
Joined: 19 January 06 2:38 pm
Location: Kambah

Re: Is it just me?

Post by allrounder » 10 January 13 1:06 pm

noikmeister wrote:
Agent Basil wrote:
allrounder wrote:I get disappointed when I see a cache title using alliteration and it isn't one of Tankengine's....
Blooming heck, I hadn't noticed............until now ! =D> =D>
Me either. One day I was chatting with MBO about a newly published cache that I assumed to be a TE one and he said it couldn't be since it wasn't alliterated. I had never noticed.

He is slipping up though. Recently a couple have been alliterated in letter but not in sound. Tsk. Tsk. [-X
perhaps tautogram would be a better description than alliteration? although in some cases it could be both!

Post Reply