Premium Member only caches

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

Premium Member only caches

Post by Laighside Legends » 25 February 12 8:32 pm

Before I start, I don't want this to be an argument - I'm just interested in what others think. It is not because of what happened yesterday.

Lately I have noticed a lot more PM only caches (25% of the newest 20 caches in SA are PM only, I recently added all the caches in the Adelaide CBD I missed over the holidays to my gps - nearly half where PM only) I'm not sure whether this is just me or if we are really getting more...

I understand that having your caches wrecked is disappointing, but I find this hard to believe as the only reason. These "cache vandals" must be very selective - Freddo has less than 1% of his 300 and something caches PM only and his caches seem to survive. Yet Chillibutts, Flippers, MtnLioness, squeaky, (there are more) seem to have nearly every one of there caches targeted???

PM only puzzles and multis are even more confusing (and annoying) - Are these "vandals" really going to solve a puzzle just to trash a cache? Or do the calculations for a multi cache?

If you are really worried about your cache why can't you just make it a simple puzzle? Or even a GCA listing?

I realise this is quite Adelaide based so maybe it belongs in the SA forum...

ian-and-penny
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1067
Joined: 13 October 03 11:45 am
Location: Travelling Australia using a Garmin Montana 650T

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by ian-and-penny » 25 February 12 8:45 pm

With the proliferation of "iPhone cachers that come into the game and don't give a toss, i think it's perfectly understandable to only make (good) caches available to those who are more serious about the game.

User avatar
akkatracker
600 or more caches found
600 or more caches found
Posts: 221
Joined: 23 December 10 3:35 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by akkatracker » 25 February 12 9:29 pm

ian-and-penny wrote:With the proliferation of "iPhone cachers that come into the game and don't give a toss, i think it's perfectly understandable to only make (good) caches available to those who are more serious about the game.
I see where you're coming at but there's another possible view:

I'm a new cacher.
There are no caches around me because they are all PM only.
I'm not going to fork out $30 for a sport I haven't played yet.
1 Month Later
Hey look, we are at a picnic and there is a cache, look it's an eclipse tin... YAY.... Now I'm going to hide 300 of these in potentially favourite worthy cache parks and watch my caches get stolen when I start to lose interest.

Sooo
PM only caches are cool with me but not all PM only, leave some good caches for the poor fellows.

User avatar
lemmykc
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found
Posts: 328
Joined: 29 August 10 1:36 pm
Location: Hampton, Victoria, Australia

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by lemmykc » 25 February 12 10:03 pm

A lot of caches eventually get moved over to non- PM, and some caches only start off life as as PM for the FTF.

I place my caches as PM to start off with because I enjoy looking at the Audit log to see who is quickest off the mark :D :D

Damo.
Posts: 2183
Joined: 04 April 04 5:01 pm
Location: Jannali

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by Damo. » 25 February 12 10:24 pm

I am aware of some examples of caches made PM to "protect" them yet being trashed regardless as well as have seen plenty of new players who become premium members straight away and quickly lose interest.

Any argument I have read in favour of them seems to be people who are paying wanting to "reward" other people who are also paying.
Also the changes with showing individuals premium or non-premium status beside logs would have some level of influence on new players which was clearly the intention. If it seems like "everybody" is a premium member to a new player why would they not make their caches PM only?

User avatar
ikkibrady
Posts: 80
Joined: 10 February 11 6:58 pm
Location: rosebud, victoria

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by ikkibrady » 25 February 12 10:37 pm

i have never been one to understand making a cache a PM cache for the first 2 weeks for the FTFers. unless these casual newbies are sitting continuously pressing the refresh button (obviously the signs of a casual newbie) they wont get any form of notification that a new cache has popped up and wont notice for 2 weeks anyway. ive seen plenty of PM caches get wrecked and even targeted. to me PM only caches are just cachers working with groundspeak to make us pay for somthing that doesnt need to be paid for. by making more and more caches PM only these "iphone" cachers that dont respect the game (i am an iphone cacher btw) will all start becoming PM and then they are just as able to get to and wreck these caches anyway. i believe the whole PM only cache is pointless.

Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by Laighside Legends » 25 February 12 10:57 pm

lemmykc wrote: I place my caches as PM to start off with because I enjoy looking at the Audit log to see who is quickest off the mark :D :D
Audit log? whats that? :?
Damo. wrote:Also the changes with showing individuals premium or non-premium status beside logs would have some level of influence on new players which was clearly the intention. If it seems like "everybody" is a premium member to a new player why would they not make their caches PM only?
This is one of those things I wish groundspeak didn't do... but I got the impression that the PM only ones were being hiddien by older players who knew the game well, that said I haven't looked closly so I could be wrong...
ikkibrady wrote:unless these casual newbies are sitting continuously pressing the refresh button...
I do do a bit of this if I'm board... just leave the page open in the background and hit refresh every hour or so - I have got a FTF and a third doing this... UMP must have been on holiday this week cos nothing got published...

What confuses my most though is PM only puzzle caches. I think I can safely say the "iPhone" cachers don't even consider the puzzles...

User avatar
CraigRat
850 or more found!!!
850 or more found!!!
Posts: 7015
Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Twitter: CraigRat
Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
Location: Launceston, TAS
Contact:

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by CraigRat » 25 February 12 11:18 pm

Laighside Legends wrote:.. but I got the impression that the PM only ones were being hiddien by older players who knew the game well, that said I haven't looked closly so I could be wrong...
Anyone who shills up $30 can hide a PM cache, it's not exactly 'exclusive' and to be honest I've done a few stinkers that were PM only.

But it does give some people a sense of either 'security' or 'exclusiveness' I suppose.

User avatar
Papa Bear_Left
800 or more hollow logs searched
800 or more hollow logs searched
Posts: 2573
Joined: 03 April 03 12:28 am
Location: Kalamunda, WA
Contact:

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by Papa Bear_Left » 26 February 12 12:34 am

I don't know if it's just my perception, but there seems to've been a major increase in PM listings from a couple of months ago.
(Any stats wizards care to weigh in on that?)

To the extent that I looked at the cache submission form to see if the checkbox had been either made more prominent or even switched to being on by default! (Neither is the case, BTW.)

Never saw much point in it myself, but it's never bothered me because we've always been premium members.

User avatar
Richary
8000 or more caches found
8000 or more caches found
Posts: 4189
Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
Location: Waitara, Sydney

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by Richary » 26 February 12 12:38 am

As a paying member of GC I can hide premium member only caches. I can't really imagine I would want to. Slightly OT but I pay to get the pocket queries and other functions, not because I want to hide a cache that only other payers can get. I would like any cacher to be able to find my cache.

Playing devils's advocate, the only reason I could see is if it is in a high muggle area, and is better found by experienced cachers who have found enough to know how to be discreet. But with the increasing number of people in the game that probably doesn't apply anymore.

Clatmandu
Posts: 20
Joined: 12 November 11 3:41 am
Location: United States

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by Clatmandu » 26 February 12 3:19 am

Laighside Legends wrote:
lemmykc wrote: I place my caches as PM to start off with because I enjoy looking at the Audit log to see who is quickest off the mark :D :D
Audit log? whats that? :?.

With PM caches, it will show who has looked at the cache page to the CO, this would be one of the reasons for puzzle caches to be PM, the CO can see who has been working on the puzzle.

User avatar
oakydog
1100 or more caches found
1100 or more caches found
Posts: 80
Joined: 11 October 09 5:06 pm
Location: Almost @ GZ

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by oakydog » 26 February 12 11:34 am

Constantly amazed at where my caches end up after only a few visits. :cry: This along with a few suspect logs :roll: have prompted me to move all my remaining caches over to PM caches.Not sure yet if it will help but so far it would appear that I receive far less Minimalist Cache Logs but that’s a different topic
And the added bonus of the Audit log makes for some interesting reading
:wink:
Last edited by oakydog on 26 February 12 6:44 pm, edited 6 times in total.

Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by Laighside Legends » 26 February 12 1:05 pm

Seems a bit odd that groundspeak don't have these "audit logs" for any cache that is owned by a Premium Member...

User avatar
blossom*
3000 or more caches found
3000 or more caches found
Posts: 1589
Joined: 25 February 09 1:59 pm
Location: West Ryde

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by blossom* » 26 February 12 7:24 pm

Audit Logs...sounds great! Maybe I should switch some of my caches to PM only....nah. I'd rather make them GA caches instead. That's a better "exclusive" club I think :D

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Premium Member only caches

Post by caughtatwork » 26 February 12 7:49 pm

We actually have audit logs for all caches which is where the counter on your cache page comes from. We don't show the details to you but it is there. Maybe you could petition to get it shown.

Post Reply