Courteous Cacher

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
User avatar
pprass
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 911
Joined: 18 December 03 11:52 pm
Location: Port Macquarie

Courteous Cacher

Post by pprass » 27 March 11 9:48 pm

It is so refreshing to see that Groundspeak are trying to raise awareness of what is expected from the caching community to keep this game going at a standard that will ensure that we can all continue to enjoy it.

Each week the Groundspeak email has a message and last weeks email mentioned:
"Within the geocaching community, the responsibilities of a courteous geocacher include respecting fellow geocachers, taking care of the environment and maintaining your caches, among other things...."

I would like to once more add to the "among other things" that courteous cachers should provide corrected co-ordinates by clicking on the "Add a coordinate to this log" box of the log page, when they find that a cache is more than say 20 metres from the posted co-ords.

On Saturday we found 4 caches in a row that were from 120 to 795 metres out and unfortunately there was not one corrected co-ord from anyone (although on one of the caches the corrected co-ords was mentioned in the log, but the cacher didn't use the "Add a coordinate to this log" box.) It doesn't take much time to get a reading and then post it on the cache page to help future cachers.

It is also the courteous owner who should update the co-ords when they are alerted to the error.

User avatar
Yurt
4500 or more caches found
4500 or more caches found
Posts: 1509
Joined: 01 May 09 10:08 pm
Location: Northern Suburbs, Sydney

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by Yurt » 27 March 11 10:08 pm

How do you even FIND caches that are so far from the listed coords? I'd struggle beyond 30 metres and probably less.

Agree with the sentiment. By the same token I often visit caches that have missing TBs and GCs and often no one has noted they are missing either in the cache or the trackable log. I make a point of doing it now and advising either or both the CO and trackable owner to mark them missing to stop them showing up in the cache.

SA_ParrotHead
4000 or more? I'm officially obsessed.
4000 or more? I'm officially obsessed.
Posts: 355
Joined: 31 August 04 9:25 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by SA_ParrotHead » 28 March 11 10:35 am

Beyond the obvious benefit of the corrected coordinates showing at the top of the log is there any advantage to ticking the corrected coordinate box.
Usually people will document in a log the reason why they are supplying a different coordinate than the one listed and supply that coordinate.
I dont think the cache listing (not the logs) changes in any way because a corrected coordinate box has been tick which might be why it isnt always done.
My experience is unless you have access to all the logs you arent going to see a corrected coordinate regardless of it being in the body or at the top of a log.
It would be good if ticking the add coordinate box modified the listing and added a line to the end of the cache discription stating that caching team X reports the cache as being found at location Y

User avatar
pprass
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 911
Joined: 18 December 03 11:52 pm
Location: Port Macquarie

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by pprass » 28 March 11 11:17 am

SA_ParrotHead wrote:Beyond the obvious benefit of the corrected coordinates showing at the top of the log is there any advantage to ticking the corrected coordinate box.
When you tick the "Add corrected co-ords" box you then enter the corrected co-ords in the fileds provided. The corrected co-ords then show up in bold at the top of the log so that it is easy to spot without having to read every single log. With my GPS, I can have practically unlimited logs loaded into the GPS.
SA_ParrotHead wrote:Usually people will document in a log the reason why they are supplying a different coordinate than the one listed and supply that coordinate.
If they do it means that you have to troll through every log looking - whereas if it shows on the top of the log in bold - it is easy to spot.
SA_ParrotHead wrote:It would be good if ticking the add coordinate box modified the listing and added a line to the end of the cache discription stating that caching team X reports the cache as being found at location Y
That would be fantastic! It would then mean that cache owners who aren't maintaining their caches are not misleading others.

User avatar
totalube
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 185
Joined: 05 July 07 9:31 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by totalube » 28 March 11 11:21 am

But remember to NOT add coordinates for a puzzle cache.

You can manually add an offset.

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 16157
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by caughtatwork » 28 March 11 11:51 am

pprass wrote:
SA_ParrotHead wrote:Beyond the obvious benefit of the corrected coordinates showing at the top of the log is there any advantage to ticking the corrected coordinate box.
When you tick the "Add corrected co-ords" box you then enter the corrected co-ords in the fileds provided. The corrected co-ords then show up in bold at the top of the log so that it is easy to spot without having to read every single log. With my GPS, I can have practically unlimited logs loaded into the GPS.
Are you sure that's a native function when being sent to a GPS?
The bold bit appears on the cache page at GC, but I'm not sure it gets sent to the GPS.
Or does it?

User avatar
pjmpjm
6000 or more caches found
6000 or more caches found
Posts: 864
Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
Twitter: Booroobin
Location: Blue Mountains
Contact:

Re: Courteous Cachers Correct Coordinates

Post by pjmpjm » 28 March 11 2:50 pm

I've often had the same thought -- it would indeed be a kindness if more geocachers posted corrected coordinates when the cache is obviously quite a distance from the published coordinates. And most COs will also appreciate a polite correction.

795 metres 'out' is an entirely different ballgame, however! Practically in another state . . . Must have had a good clue or Superman's x-ray vision!

But I'd say that if a cache is more than 10-12 metres out, then a tick of the box and an entry of suggested coordinates is in order. Anything less than this is still more or less within the limits of GPSr accuracy.

I've slowly realised that many people don't read the earlier logs when they go geocaching. So this effort won't help them. But that's their choice.

But the rest of us appreciate the thoughtfulness.

A good issue to raise . . .

User avatar
pprass
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 911
Joined: 18 December 03 11:52 pm
Location: Port Macquarie

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by pprass » 28 March 11 6:40 pm

caughtatwork wrote:...Are you sure that's a native function when being sent to a GPS?
This is how the Magellan shows the log:

Image

Not in bold, there is something going on with the HTML format with Groundspeak, but it shows in the first line.

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 16157
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by caughtatwork » 28 March 11 7:22 pm

Sweet. Didn't know that.

User avatar
Hoojar
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 487
Joined: 26 May 08 6:04 pm
Location: The Gong

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by Hoojar » 29 March 11 9:44 am

pprass wrote:On Saturday we found 4 caches in a row that were from 120 to 795 metres out
Chip and I are driving up the coast for Easter and have this hiders other cache, http://coord.info/GC2Q0XA, on our hit list. It concerns me that we may waste our time looking in the wrong spot. Time is important when trying to drive from Wollongong to Byron Bay and cache along the way!!!

Is there a way that this hider can be reported to Groundspeak? 795m out is just insane!

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 16157
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by caughtatwork » 29 March 11 10:11 am

795m?
Log an SBA.
Write to i,Riblit.
Write to theUMP.
Don't tolerate this sort of rubbish.
Act now, clean up the game.

User avatar
Mr Router
1500 or more caches found
1500 or more caches found
Posts: 2782
Joined: 22 May 05 11:59 am
Location: Bathurst

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by Mr Router » 29 March 11 11:15 am


Rabbitto
4000 or more? I'm officially obsessed.
4000 or more? I'm officially obsessed.
Posts: 793
Joined: 01 April 04 2:01 pm
Location: Rowville, Victoria

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by Rabbitto » 29 March 11 3:45 pm

pprass wrote:On Saturday we found 4 caches in a row that were from 120 to 795 metres out...
Image
Pprass search pattern looking for a cache 795m out

User avatar
squalid
2700 or more caches found
2700 or more caches found
Posts: 255
Joined: 06 February 04 12:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by squalid » 30 March 11 12:05 am

No Rabbitto, that's his hair!

User avatar
Pesky!
1350 or more caches found
1350 or more caches found
Posts: 1871
Joined: 04 April 03 11:48 pm
Location: Umina Beach, NSW

Re: Courteous Cacher

Post by Pesky! » 31 March 11 9:19 am

pprass wrote: ...Snip....
On Saturday we found 4 caches in a row that were from 120 to 795 metres out ...Snip...
OK without giving away your methods, how did you locate the cache that was almost a Kilometer from the GZ was listed?

That is one mighty big cache hunt spiral ... let’s see area of a circle = Pi * r squared.......1984558.5 square meters to search! or 1984.5 square kilometers, that sounds like a lot !

I don't think I can even work out how far you'd walk if you followed an accurate spiral, (given no obstacles, and flat ground)
the length of a line in a spiral is equal to

L = pi*N*(D)/2 where N = (D)/(2*T)
Where D is diameter of the spiral, and T is the thickness of the line.
:-k

in our case T= the width of your trail as you walk.
I found this on google, as I struggle to work out if i got the correct change at lunch time with my math skills !

\:D/ I'm gonna get this printed on a T-shirt. \:D/

Geocaching: L = pi*N*(D)/2 where N = (D)/(2*T)

OH boy! I made a Nerd JOke!

Post Reply