For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
-
Kerry
- Posts: 224
- Joined: 22 April 03 6:45 pm
- Location: Australia
Post
by Kerry » 26 February 11 8:51 am
The following ICSM wording is a reasonable explanation. The key word being "trigonometry"
Hilltop survey marks are often referred to as 'Trig Points' or 'Trig Stations' because trigonometry is used to calculate their positions – their full title is Trigonometric Point or Station. They are permanently marked on the ground and usually have a beacon or cairn of rocks directly above them so they can be seen from a distance. Sometimes the Trig Station is an observation pillar on which the surveying instrument is placed – including theodolites, Electronic Distance Measuring devices (EDMs) and GPS antennas.
The actual in ground survey mark used (apart from say pillars) can be typically similar depending on what authority installed them. It is more the purpose of the mark that generally defines what one might class it.
The typical quad or triangle supported beacon or pillar make setting instrucments on these marks reasonably easy but site access in many cases controlled what type of beacon was constructed. The rock cairn typically uses local materials that don't need to be lugged into a site. So next time you see a rock cairn think that generally there is a permanent mark at the bottom of the beacon post etc and to set an instrument over this mark requires the cairn to be disassembled rock by rock then reassembled when the survey is complete. Also in this case there will generally be an eccentric mark associated with the main trig station
-
pjmpjm
- 6000 or more caches found
- Posts: 864
- Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
-
Contact:
Post
by pjmpjm » 26 February 11 9:45 am
Kerry wrote:The rock cairn typically uses local materials that don't need to be lugged into a site. So next time you see a rock cairn think that generally there is a permanent mark at the bottom of the beacon post, etc., and to set an instrument over this mark requires the cairn to be disassembled rock by rock then reassembled when the survey is complete.
Thanks for the very interesting information!
And I never knew that a PM would be located under the stone cairn . . .
Not that I'm now tempted to find it -- stone by stone . . .
-
ST_7
- 300 or more found
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 07 May 10 5:28 pm
- Location: Australia
Post
by ST_7 » 26 February 11 10:35 pm
pjmpjm wrote:Kerry wrote:The rock cairn typically uses local materials that don't need to be lugged into a site. So next time you see a rock cairn think that generally there is a permanent mark at the bottom of the beacon post, etc., and to set an instrument over this mark requires the cairn to be disassembled rock by rock then reassembled when the survey is complete.
Thanks for the very interesting information!
And I never knew that a PM would be located under the stone cairn . . .
Not that I'm now tempted to find it -- stone by stone . . .
This is what an unpiled Trig looks like -
http://geocaching.com.au/gallery/image/28399
In all the surveyors sketches that I have come across, it is generally refered to as the 'trig plug'.
-
pjmpjm
- 6000 or more caches found
- Posts: 864
- Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
-
Contact:
Post
by pjmpjm » 26 February 11 10:57 pm
Many thanks! This is very interesting, to say the least. I really had no idea. The photo is a real eye-opener.
Now I may in fact be tempted when I next encounter a rock cairn . . .
-
Teirae
- 50 or more caches found
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 17 August 10 7:56 pm
- Location: The Rock, NSW
-
Contact:
Post
by Teirae » 27 February 11 9:37 am
now we are going to be debating rock cairns...i know of one...and i know its not a servey point or trig point or anything...its the remains of an old church they used and piled it up. i guess it marks the spot where a church once stood...
-
Kerry
- Posts: 224
- Joined: 22 April 03 6:45 pm
- Location: Australia
Post
by Kerry » 27 February 11 2:22 pm
pjmpjm wrote:
Many thanks! This is very interesting, to say the least. I really had no idea. The photo is a real eye-opener.
Now I may in fact be tempted when I next encounter a rock cairn . . .
Yes they are quite easy to pull apart but I doubt you have the means or instruments to put it back togeather with any degree of accuracy? Also it is basically illegal to disturb a survey mark unless you are authorized to do so.
-
Zalgariath
- 5500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1749
- Joined: 17 August 09 10:44 am
- Location: Sydney, NSW
Post
by Zalgariath » 01 March 11 8:25 am
I have decided I wont be listing the UK Trig Points I find here as there is already a DEDICATED site that ONLY has Trigs
http://www.trigpointinguk.com/. 8000ish on their database and Im not a fan of ever dual listing a feature so hopefully they use GPX format and I can d/l all of them
-
caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
-
Contact:
Post
by caughtatwork » 01 March 11 8:50 am
Zalgariath wrote:I have decided I wont be listing the UK Trig Points I find here as there is already a DEDICATED site that ONLY has Trigs
http://www.trigpointinguk.com/. 8000ish on their database and Im not a fan of ever dual listing a feature so hopefully they use GPX format and I can d/l all of them
Sweeeeet!
-
Zalgariath
- 5500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1749
- Joined: 17 August 09 10:44 am
- Location: Sydney, NSW
Post
by Zalgariath » 01 March 11 9:17 am
THEY DO USE GPX
BUT! They use the same number system as GCA
(TPXXXX) so I might have to create a separate database on GSAK for them as otherwise I will get clashes with GCA Trigs
-
pjmpjm
- 6000 or more caches found
- Posts: 864
- Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
-
Contact:
Post
by pjmpjm » 02 March 11 1:48 am
Zalgariath wrote:and I can d/l all of them
I first thought you wrote that you would log all of them . . .
-
Yurt
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 01 May 09 10:08 pm
- Location: Northern Suburbs, Sydney
Post
by Yurt » 05 March 11 5:36 pm
So where does this set fit in? It's just like a trig but it says on the description that it's a permanent marker, or the series is.
http://geocaching.com.au/cache/tp5620 - there's three more there apparently.
We found one like this a few weeks ago about halfway between two logged trigs. They were only about 400 metres apart and this one was exactly like a trig but with a cap not vanes and the plaque had a PM number so it's some sort of permanent marker. Didn't log it but have the photos.
-
rogerw3
- 8000 or more caches found
- Posts: 683
- Joined: 26 July 09 11:11 am
- Location: Lithgow
Post
by rogerw3 » 05 March 11 7:56 pm
yes that is very interesting, but I think that despite the similar appearance, these where set up to check the alignment of the fuel pipe line, the check points would have to be elevated for ease of visibility. As a secondary function they may be used by the University as a survey teaching aid. They are clearly marked as a PM (Permanent marker) not as a TS (Trigonometric Station).
After some searching I came across this pdf well I printed and scanned it since I don't know how to insert a pdf here!
Again it shows these as PM, if they were Trigs they would have a TS number.
-
pjmpjm
- 6000 or more caches found
- Posts: 864
- Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
-
Contact:
Post
by pjmpjm » 05 March 11 9:29 pm
rogerw3 wrote: Yes that is very interesting, but I think that despite the similar appearance, these where set up to check the alignment of the fuel pipe line, the check points would have to be elevated for ease of visibility. As a secondary function they may be used by the University as a survey teaching aid. They are clearly marked as a PM (Permanent marker) not as a TS (Trigonometric Station). After some searching I came across this pdf well I printed and scanned it since I don't know how to insert a pdf here!
Again it shows these as PM, if they were Trigs they would have a TS number.
Very interesting indeed. Many thanks for sharing.
-
ST_7
- 300 or more found
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 07 May 10 5:28 pm
- Location: Australia
Post
by ST_7 » 05 March 11 10:52 pm
Yurt wrote:So where does this set fit in? It's just like a trig but it says on the description that it's a permanent marker, or the series is.
http://geocaching.com.au/cache/tp5620 - there's three more there apparently.
These Permanent Marks are part of the Newcastle EDM Testline. Surveyors use these testlines to calibrate their instruments. They are not trig stations.
The following quote is from the 'Surveyor General’s Directions - No. 5 - Verification of Distance Measuring Equipment'
The Surveying and Spatial Information Regulation 2006 requires surveyors to verify their Electronic Distance Measuring (EDM) equipment in relation to the State Primary Standard of measurement, in the form of pillared testlines. The Surveyor General has established eighteen concrete pillared EDM Testlines throughout NSW, three in Sydney and the remainder located in regional centres throughout the State. Each pillar contains a stainless steel base plate with a 5/8" Whitworth screwed spigot to receive the tribrach. The spigot is protected by an acorn nut and PVC cap. Use of all testlines is provided free of charge to the owners of EDM equipment for the calibration of their instruments.
http://geocaching.com.au/gallery/image/28842
-
pjmpjm
- 6000 or more caches found
- Posts: 864
- Joined: 09 April 10 12:35 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
-
Contact:
Post
by pjmpjm » 05 March 11 11:07 pm
Delta-squad wrote:These Permanent Marks are part of the Newcastle EDM Testline. Surveyors use these testlines to calibrate their instruments. They are not trig stations.
Very helpful. Thanks, Delta-squad.