The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 01 January 10 10:23 pm
- Location: Jan Juc
- Contact:
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Ripper...thanks heaps...going over to the gnome photos thread now....
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Does anyone else seem to spend most of their time planning which gnomes to gnap next, where to drop them, checking who's last found them and guessing where they'll be dropped, working out if you can pick them up based on how many logs since your last, negotiating intertstate travel plans and planning gnome tortures inbetween?
Work seems to be coming a poor second since 1st December
Work seems to be coming a poor second since 1st December
- Zalgariath
- 5500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1749
- Joined: 17 August 09 10:44 am
- Location: Sydney, NSW
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Im trying to get some work done! Mostly I'll only try to gnab gnomes close to home or on route to places... but if they are new in town I'll still get distracted enough to detour towards themblossom* wrote:Does anyone else seem to spend most of their time planning which gnomes to gnap next, where to drop them, checking who's last found them and guessing where they'll be dropped, working out if you can pick them up based on how many logs since your last, negotiating intertstate travel plans and planning gnome tortures inbetween?
Work seems to be coming a poor second since 1st December
-
- 850 or more found!!!
- Posts: 164
- Joined: 30 August 08 8:56 am
- Location: One foot on either side of the border (SE Qld/NE NSW)
- Contact:
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Oh yes, you've described my plotting precisely.blossom* wrote:Does anyone else seem to spend most of their time planning which gnomes to gnap next, where to drop them, checking who's last found them and guessing where they'll be dropped, working out if you can pick them up based on how many logs since your last, negotiating intertstate travel plans and planning gnome tortures inbetween?
Of course there is also the decisions about whether to go and grab and move or leave them for other players. I'm referring to the Lismore gnomes and whether to let them play close to home for a while longer or whether to bring them north to within reach of the SEQ cachers.
As for planning gnome tortures, Eromsil and Stealthy McSteath will tell you that we (Petan) extended much hospitality in their direction. See GA2785 and GA2788.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17021
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
It's not registered.aussie-O's wrote:C@W, my gnome, http://geocaching.com.au/cache/ga2952, isn't on the gegnome project website ladder. Can you help?
http://www.cachinggames.com/gegnomeproj ... create.php to add it.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17021
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Which cache?Tuena wrote:What means are available for the administrators/moderators to ensure the validity of moves & hides in this race?
Is there an alert when a cache is moved more than a certain distance?
The move I noticed is probably a genuine error but if my gnome suddenly appeared in the middle of the ocean & was then found, I'd expect a knock on the door.
If it's wrong it will get fixed, but as I'm in the USA at the moment it may not be immediate.
If it's a breach of the spirit of the game, it will be DQ'd.
-
- 700 or more Caches found
- Posts: 138
- Joined: 03 December 09 8:55 pm
- Location: South Australia
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
blossom* wrote:Does anyone else seem to spend most of their time planning which gnomes to gnap next, where to drop them, checking who's last found them and guessing where they'll be dropped, working out if you can pick them up based on how many logs since your last, negotiating intertstate travel plans and planning gnome tortures inbetween?
Work seems to be coming a poor second since 1st December
Sadly this is me - I check where they are, look at why I can head that way...I always forget to plan where I could hide a gnome though.
We are about to head to Perth for a quick visit there (wedding), then from there to Victoria for a flying visit before home again to SA....It is so hard working out which gnome will come for a flight with us, also if we would get time to dump one and pick up another....but it is so much fun planning
-
- 2300 or more caches found
- Posts: 415
- Joined: 29 April 09 10:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
You could always contact a local to have a gnome ready for you to pick up in an easier location.emily~angel wrote: We are about to head to Perth for a quick visit there (wedding), then from there to Victoria for a flying visit before home again to SA....It is so hard working out which gnome will come for a flight with us, also if we would get time to dump one and pick up another....but it is so much fun planning
I do gnome delivering services for cheap.
- MtnLioness
- 2800 or more caches found
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 12 May 09 5:50 pm
- Location: Seaton, Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Mine are very small, if you could get your hands on one or both, they could travel in your pockets!!emily~angel wrote:blossom* wrote:Does anyone else seem to spend most of their time planning which gnomes to gnap next, where to drop them, checking who's last found them and guessing where they'll be dropped, working out if you can pick them up based on how many logs since your last, negotiating intertstate travel plans and planning gnome tortures inbetween?
Work seems to be coming a poor second since 1st December
Sadly this is me - I check where they are, look at why I can head that way...I always forget to plan where I could hide a gnome though.
We are about to head to Perth for a quick visit there (wedding), then from there to Victoria for a flying visit before home again to SA....It is so hard working out which gnome will come for a flight with us, also if we would get time to dump one and pick up another....but it is so much fun planning
- Fairly Magic
- 500 or more caches logged
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 30 July 05 9:02 pm
- Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Well apart from the work bit, working in the laybye counter this time of year I keep getting hours added to my roster and planned gnome gnabs are being deferredblossom* wrote:Does anyone else seem to spend most of their time planning which gnomes to gnap next, where to drop them, checking who's last found them and guessing where they'll be dropped, working out if you can pick them up based on how many logs since your last, negotiating intertstate travel plans and planning gnome tortures inbetween?
Work seems to be coming a poor second since 1st December
and you forgot mentioning doing a happy dance when your gnome gets moved
Now I have a dilemma. There is a gnome that has a mission to be in SA for Christmas and has been dropped near the airport to aid his mission. Question is - do I go find him. Maybe he could visit a few of the sites nearer the airport? Maybe he might be better positioned near a tb lounge? Maybe I could be evil and drag him off on a tour of Hobart? Oh what shall I do?
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Now that C@W has zooooooomed a few gnomes ahead with the first o/s trip, maybe we could include a prize for the furthest distance travelled by a gnome totally within Australia? (That way, i still have a chance to win )
- Yurt
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: 01 May 09 10:08 pm
- Location: Northern Suburbs, Sydney
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
I note a few more players have joined the game.
Now to drop a gnome on the front door step of some of the more 'recalcitrant' geocachers!
Now to drop a gnome on the front door step of some of the more 'recalcitrant' geocachers!
- Fairly Magic
- 500 or more caches logged
- Posts: 278
- Joined: 30 July 05 9:02 pm
- Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
HI
I have a day off between being nice to harrassed/rude/over shopped christmas folk. I am trying to restore my niceoseness to yukky people by going gnoming
But I need a rule clarification please.
There is no limit to the number of times other cachers can find / move the cache provided there are at least two other finds / moves in between.
seems straight forward to me, so what do the game admins do when this rule is not followed?
I have a day off between being nice to harrassed/rude/over shopped christmas folk. I am trying to restore my niceoseness to yukky people by going gnoming
But I need a rule clarification please.
There is no limit to the number of times other cachers can find / move the cache provided there are at least two other finds / moves in between.
seems straight forward to me, so what do the game admins do when this rule is not followed?
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
The expectation would be that the move would be disallowed in the calculations of distance and number of moves I guess. But realistically, unless someone pointed out the error, the stats would automatically update and ignore the broken rule I expect. Once the error was noticed, some logs could be deleted and then all would becalculated within the guidelines again.Fairly Magic wrote:HI
I have a day off between being nice to harrassed/rude/over shopped christmas folk. I am trying to restore my niceoseness to yukky people by going gnoming
But I need a rule clarification please.
There is no limit to the number of times other cachers can find / move the cache provided there are at least two other finds / moves in between.
seems straight forward to me, so what do the game admins do when this rule is not followed?
- Just a cacher
- Posts: 630
- Joined: 03 July 10 3:01 am
- Location: Northside, Canberra, Australia
Re: The Moving Cache Race for 2010/2011
Game admins? Are you sure? I think you might be asking a bit much, here.
I think C@W would send a fairly stiff e-mail, if the situation called for it.
I assume that disqualification is a legal option, but to be avoided if at all possible.
If you have a specific problem, I suggest you send a private message to C@W.
Wendy
I think C@W would send a fairly stiff e-mail, if the situation called for it.
I assume that disqualification is a legal option, but to be avoided if at all possible.
If you have a specific problem, I suggest you send a private message to C@W.
Wendy