'Inappropriate' cache locations?

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
Huurtle
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 141
Joined: 09 September 05 3:28 pm
Location: SA

Re: 'Inappropriate' cache locations?

Post by Huurtle » 17 July 09 7:08 pm

lioness & milkman wrote:I absolutley do take on what others are saying and I also find it amusing that the most intence responces are coming from the direction of the most negative people. (or rather, the most reliably negative loggers)
I apologise greatly if you think I am being a jerk for accusing the higher posters as a whole of being jerks themselves, but about a third of all the high finders I have come across over the years HAVE been displaying an attitude to some degree, (more than the average person) of supercilious behaviour.
If I have portrayed an image of myself that offends you, please feel free to accept my apology.

I Aim only to reflect the truth in all that I do and if that comes across too 'in-your-face' then simply ignore me.
Still yet to see any evidence of anything abusive. Just more opinions imed at a personal level! As Ciril's Mum says "If you haven't got anything nice to say, then don't say it".
Now let's get off the personal barbs and get back to the topic of this thread?

Post Reply