FDF as well as FTF
- SecretSquirrel-BJC
- 2700 or more caches found
- Posts: 731
- Joined: 02 February 07 1:01 pm
- Location: Gungahlin ACT
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
No need to use any code.mtrax wrote:I shall attempt you use the *FDF* code, and hopefully this will be added as a feature in the future..
It calculates automagically.caughtatwork wrote:http://geocaching.com.au/my/hotlist/firstdayfinds/
Here you go peeps, your list of FDF's for your statistical enjoyment.
I was wonder if we should remove Events from this statistic as by there nature they are always FDF
http://geocaching.com.au/my/hotlist/firstdayfinds/
http://geocaching.com.au/my/hotlist/firstdayfinds/
- Map Monkey
- 1050 or more caches found
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: 08 April 04 3:06 pm
- Location: Banana Republic
- Contact:
- mtbikeroz
- 5000 or more caches found
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 28 November 03 10:49 am
- Location: Canberra, ACT
FDF = ????<br>
mtrax originally said FDF = BTW when I say FDF I really me within first 24hrs (for those late night published caches)
<p>
However, C@W stats from http://geocaching.com.au/my/hotlist/firstdayfinds/ give instead <br>
(a) From the First find on a cache, finding it within the next 24hrs, in addition to<br>
(b) actual FTFs.<p>
As an example, see GCN6Y6 Snowy Mountains Hydro - Avenue of Flags Cooma, NSW, Australia, laid/published 21 March 2005, found first by Diadem on 23 April 2005, and then me a few hours later on the same day, within the first 24 hrs of the first FIND. Clearly 33 days is not a FDF according tto Mtrax's definition????<br>
This cache is on my list from C@W's stats as one of my FDF's.<p>
I don't think this is what is meant by the original meaning of FDF, or is it? <p>
My stats from C@W's link was 199, and I only have 105 FTF's. Sure, I expect to have more FDF's (within 24hrs of being published, but not 94 extra more - struck me as a bit high for my MO)<p>
To see what mtrax perhaps really meant, see what the great man himself wrote on a recent FTF FDF cache log of his at http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... b6aea5883e .<p>
Interesting discussion overall, definitely support the "journey theory" chasing FTF's at night to see magic city lights etc. I've seen Canberra at 5am in mid winter - magic from a mountain top. <br>
Just that the definition and C@W's stats seemed all very odd and perhaps misunderstood, by me at least
mtrax originally said FDF = BTW when I say FDF I really me within first 24hrs (for those late night published caches)
<p>
However, C@W stats from http://geocaching.com.au/my/hotlist/firstdayfinds/ give instead <br>
(a) From the First find on a cache, finding it within the next 24hrs, in addition to<br>
(b) actual FTFs.<p>
As an example, see GCN6Y6 Snowy Mountains Hydro - Avenue of Flags Cooma, NSW, Australia, laid/published 21 March 2005, found first by Diadem on 23 April 2005, and then me a few hours later on the same day, within the first 24 hrs of the first FIND. Clearly 33 days is not a FDF according tto Mtrax's definition????<br>
This cache is on my list from C@W's stats as one of my FDF's.<p>
I don't think this is what is meant by the original meaning of FDF, or is it? <p>
My stats from C@W's link was 199, and I only have 105 FTF's. Sure, I expect to have more FDF's (within 24hrs of being published, but not 94 extra more - struck me as a bit high for my MO)<p>
To see what mtrax perhaps really meant, see what the great man himself wrote on a recent FTF FDF cache log of his at http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... b6aea5883e .<p>
Interesting discussion overall, definitely support the "journey theory" chasing FTF's at night to see magic city lights etc. I've seen Canberra at 5am in mid winter - magic from a mountain top. <br>
Just that the definition and C@W's stats seemed all very odd and perhaps misunderstood, by me at least
-
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 20 March 04 10:34 pm
- Location: Melbourne
-
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 20 March 04 10:34 pm
- Location: Melbourne
You would think so but a recent FTF of mine was challenged by someone finding it a couple of weeks later and claiming I hadn't written in the log book! I had to post a picture of the cache before they retracted their accusations!Mr.Coffee and the Clan wrote: Keeping it simple FTF is First to Find no matter how long it takes
I think FDF was infact where I'm suggesting it stops, but the main aim is to encourage people to get out when cache is released..Mr.Coffee and the Clan wrote:In theory it sounds interesting but where do we stop? FDF's, 2DF2TF (second day find 2nd to find), 2DFFTF (second day find first to find), 7DF2TF (7th day find second to find), etc ,etc<p>
Keeping it simple FTF is First to Find no matter how long it takes
I hear now-one complaining about the Olympic 1st,2nd and 3rd placing as well as runners up frequently appearing in most sports.
but for some reason we have the mentality of FTF or nothing else is worthwhile. this takes nothing away from FTF, but this has nothing to do with FTF
-
- 1800 or more caches found
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 02 December 07 8:29 am
- Location: Cranbourne East, Victoria
->Mr.Coffee and the Clan wrote:<p>Echo wrote:Try my area, caches last a maximum of 10 minutes here.
That's why we have started calling them Fast To Find.
We have a lot of fast to find sharks here...
Fast to Find Sharks in your area?, 10 minutes from release to found? WOW I would like to be in an area like that.
-
- 4500 or more caches found
- Posts: 706
- Joined: 20 March 04 10:34 pm
- Location: Melbourne