Does anyone else feel "guilty" when.....

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
fidjit
50 or more caches found
50 or more caches found
Posts: 39
Joined: 10 April 08 12:31 pm
Location: Hobart

Does anyone else feel "guilty" when.....

Post by fidjit » 09 December 08 11:19 am

the cache you've just found has a DNF logged after your find. Do you worry that you hadn't rehidden properly ???

Case in point, one I did in Sydney had 4 DNFs after I did it. As such I started feeling guilty that I hadn't rehidden it properly, it's fallen off as I hadn't reattached it properly, it was muggled cause someone saw me....etc...etc....

The DNFs weren't new cachers and to me the hide was pretty obvious.

I put a watch on the cache and kept seeing DNFs.........

I couldnt' go and check it myself

Of course the fifth log was a find, so obviously I was worried about nothing :P

does anyone else get these feelings ???? :D

Note: I didn't feel guilty enough to buy a plane fare to Sydney to check however.... :P

User avatar
Snuva
1500 or more caches found
1500 or more caches found
Posts: 1081
Joined: 05 July 04 5:38 pm
Twitter: Snuva
Location: Hobart
Contact:

Post by Snuva » 09 December 08 1:08 pm

Yes, it worries me too. You wonder if you weren't stealthy enough so you're responsible for it being muggled, you didn't place it back solidly, the place you hid a moveable might have had too much security etc. But all you can do is the best you can do!<P>

I of course also feel guilty when I tell a cache owner I'll replace his moveable but it takes me forever as I'm looking for a small plastic bag and my usual supplier no longer has them. . . :oops: :wink: :cry:

User avatar
pprass
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 911
Joined: 18 December 03 11:52 pm
Location: Port Macquarie

Post by pprass » 09 December 08 1:36 pm

Yes of course we do. And we believe that anyone with half a conscience and regard for this game should feel the same way. We hate it when a DNF is reported after our find - and unfortunately it has happened a few times.
Someone once mentioned that there is a stats page in GCA that lists cachers in descending order with that dishonorable statistic - C@W is it still there? Hope we are way down on the list :(

User avatar
zactyl
Posts: 1171
Joined: 28 July 04 6:40 pm
Location: Mullumbimby, NSW

Post by zactyl » 09 December 08 1:41 pm

I dislike public hides for this very reason, give me a nice quiet bush setting any day :)

fidjit
50 or more caches found
50 or more caches found
Posts: 39
Joined: 10 April 08 12:31 pm
Location: Hobart

Post by fidjit » 09 December 08 1:51 pm

zactyl wrote:I dislike public hides for this very reason, give me a nice quiet bush setting any day :)
Even if it's a bush hid, if the next find is a DNF, I'd be thinking...... maybe I didn't cover it properly , or put it deep enough in the hole or someone was watching me or aliens took my baby or....................

Must just have a guilty conscience..... :)

User avatar
Ksix
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 85
Joined: 25 November 07 10:47 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by Ksix » 09 December 08 2:12 pm

We very much dislike it more when we log a DNF on a cache only to see someone that very afternoon (or next day) log "quick easy find" or "found without any trouble" etc etc :oops: :oops: </br></br>
Guess it comes down to</br></br>
"Some days you've got it and others NOT !!!" :lol: :lol: </br></br>

Cheers,</br>
Ksix</br>
"Eat... Sleep... Geocache..."

User avatar
GammaPiSigma
450 or more roots tripped over
450 or more roots tripped over
Posts: 227
Joined: 23 May 04 7:46 pm
Location: Campbelltown, NSW

Post by GammaPiSigma » 09 December 08 2:16 pm

Fidjit,<br><br>
You have every right to be concerned it shows you care about what you are doing which is a good thing.<br><br>
I think an even worse situation is when the cache does disappear after you were the last finder. A case in point: http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... 2f02&log=y
<br><br>
When I found the above cache it was barely covered and when I put it back I put heaps of cover over it as I was concerned that it was far too easy to see from the nearby track.
<br><br>
Mike.

User avatar
Team Wibble
2100 or more geocaches found
2100 or more geocaches found
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 October 04 11:47 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by Team Wibble » 09 December 08 2:57 pm

I think its natural to feel guilty but if you have been caching responsibly then you should have a clear conscience. These things happen.

Make sure it is hidden as found and that you weren't observed while finding it and you can't really be responsible if the next finds are DNFs.

On the other hand, if you write a log like the last team to find this cache....
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_de ... y&decrypt=

:roll:

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by caughtatwork » 09 December 08 2:57 pm

pprass wrote:Yes of course we do. And we believe that anyone with half a conscience and regard for this game should feel the same way. We hate it when a DNF is reported after our find - and unfortunately it has happened a few times.
Someone once mentioned that there is a stats page in GCA that lists cachers in descending order with that dishonorable statistic - C@W is it still there? Hope we are way down on the list :(
You're 10th in Victoria with a score of 12 :-)

User avatar
Bundyrumandcoke
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
Posts: 1021
Joined: 07 August 06 1:54 pm
Location: Blackwater Queensland

Post by Bundyrumandcoke » 09 December 08 6:22 pm

Whats worse is the cacher after you reports the cache has been muggled, or worse destroyed. I've had that happen, a couple of times. Makes me wonder if I was spotted replacing it, or didnt replace well enough.

Cheers
Bundy

User avatar
nomad_penguin
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 321
Joined: 28 August 06 10:49 pm
Location: SA

Post by nomad_penguin » 09 December 08 6:31 pm

I keep a 'Guilt List', that is, a bookmark list on GC where I add each cache after I find it. Once the cache is successfully found, I remove it from the list. That way, if there are several DNFs, and I can go and check, I will (it's never happened as far as I can recall).

It's also interesting to see how frequently some caches are found. Z caches and the like have often sat on 'The Guilt List' for months :roll:.

User avatar
big dazza
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 66
Joined: 26 August 07 1:06 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by big dazza » 10 December 08 12:25 am

I too anxiously await caches I find to be found again. So far I have 5 on my watch list, 1 confirmed last to find (very embarrassing) and 1 broken container (oops) :oops: Oh, busted by police once too :shock:

strong-arm
500 or more caches logged
500 or more caches logged
Posts: 42
Joined: 30 November 07 11:06 am
Location: Carseldine, Brisbane

Post by strong-arm » 10 December 08 9:43 am

caughtatwork wrote:
pprass wrote:Yes of course we do. And we believe that anyone with half a conscience and regard for this game should feel the same way. We hate it when a DNF is reported after our find - and unfortunately it has happened a few times.
Someone once mentioned that there is a stats page in GCA that lists cachers in descending order with that dishonorable statistic - C@W is it still there? Hope we are way down on the list :(
You're 10th in Victoria with a score of 12 :-)
For the paranoid amongst us, is this stat available to all within the site somewhere?

User avatar
Papa Bear_Left
800 or more hollow logs searched
800 or more hollow logs searched
Posts: 2573
Joined: 03 April 03 12:28 am
Location: Kalamunda, WA
Contact:

Post by Papa Bear_Left » 10 December 08 10:31 am

I've looked at the "last to find" stats occasionally and some of the same names keep appearing there.

However, it's not because of lack of care on their part, generally, it's more that these are outback travellers who come across the remnants of UV-destroyed plastic containers placed in the early days of caching, before we had the experience to know that a lunchbox doesn't do well in the middle of a desert for years!

User avatar
The Spindoctors
Posts: 1767
Joined: 08 October 03 8:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by The Spindoctors » 10 December 08 10:45 am

Two months ago I placed four TBs in a cache that then disappeared.

I felt bad five times over - once for the cache owner and again for each of the TB owners.

A week later I placed another TB in one of my caches, onyl to find it went AWOL soon afterwards.

Post Reply