Well Rounded cachers
Well Rounded cachers
With the competition due to start soon, am wondering if any "Well rounded cachers" exist at present
Here is my profile - I don't even rate a 3/3
Anybody else like to show their profile?
Kevin
Here is my profile - I don't even rate a 3/3
Anybody else like to show their profile?
Kevin
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
You certainly do rate a 3/3, in fact you rate a 4/4. i.e. You have every combination of difficulty up to 3/3 and 4/4. To be a 5/5 will be a huge challenge.
I'm a 3/3 but no more. I'm 7 caches away from a possible 4/4. Given that the caches have to be found during the game period and it's taken me 4 years to get to this position, I doubt that the next 3 months will be much different.
http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/caughta ... iculty.png
I'm a 3/3 but no more. I'm 7 caches away from a possible 4/4. Given that the caches have to be found during the game period and it's taken me 4 years to get to this position, I doubt that the next 3 months will be much different.
http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/caughta ... iculty.png
http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/Craig%2 ... iculty.png
Still have 1 cache to reach 3/3, 8 to reach 4/4, and far too many to reach 5/5. Hope to have a couple of the blanks filled in by this time next week though
Still have 1 cache to reach 3/3, 8 to reach 4/4, and far too many to reach 5/5. Hope to have a couple of the blanks filled in by this time next week though
I thought it would be fun to look at our graph and was surprised to see that we are nearly a 3/3 only missing 2.
http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/atlmum/ ... iculty.png
Was wondering why some graphs are different in the set out
Looking forward to the game.
http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/atlmum/ ... iculty.png
Was wondering why some graphs are different in the set out
Looking forward to the game.
Was wondering why some graphs are different in the set out
The coloured graph I produced was a result of a GSAK macro
FindStatGen, available at
http://gsak.net/board/index.php?showtopic=4623&st=40
Kevin
- Map Monkey
- 1050 or more caches found
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: 08 April 04 3:06 pm
- Location: Banana Republic
- Contact:
- The Spindoctors
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: 08 October 03 8:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Two caches off 4/4 - http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/The%20S ... iculty.png
Of course we all start from scratch as of Saturday.
Of course we all start from scratch as of Saturday.
- tronador
- 6500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
- Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW
You can do all of this on GCA queries too and they will include GA caches as well as GCmtrax wrote:note am I stating the obvious here:
with GSAK you can just open your filter with the selected terran/diff and therefor is shows all your eligible caches. (loaded via PQ)
you could probably write a macro to show all your remaining candidates but might be easier just doing a few searches at a time.
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
There is no ladder ranking as such.
It's a challenge against yourself. i.e. You get to be a Well Rounded Cacher (or if you're like me, you don't get the time to go caching) or not.
Everyone who achieves the ranking of "Well Rounded Cacher" will receive a "token" prize, so there is no need to be first or fastest or anything other than the challenge against yourself.
The names that appear on the ladder are random when you get the same score.
It's a challenge against yourself. i.e. You get to be a Well Rounded Cacher (or if you're like me, you don't get the time to go caching) or not.
Everyone who achieves the ranking of "Well Rounded Cacher" will receive a "token" prize, so there is no need to be first or fastest or anything other than the challenge against yourself.
The names that appear on the ladder are random when you get the same score.