GeosportZ - Questions and Clarifications
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Thanks for understanding. I'm a programmer not a grammarianrichary wrote:I'm not quite sure I get the difference in semantics between the meaning of any year and any month. Not that it matters as long as the rules are clear to all.<p>Would finding a cache hidden on 8/8/08 be allowable or not irrelevant to me, I have claimed that category on 6/8.
Yes, 080808 is perfectly acceptable.
- Coffee and Cache
- 2200 or more geocaches found
- Posts: 183
- Joined: 27 January 07 3:35 pm
- Location: Surrey Hills, Victoria
- Coffee and Cache
- 2200 or more geocaches found
- Posts: 183
- Joined: 27 January 07 3:35 pm
- Location: Surrey Hills, Victoria
Re: Badminton
Me again I'm afraid.<p>
What about if the flying ability of the animal is somewhere between that of an eagle and a kiwi? <p>
I'm thinking specifically of the Lyrebird. They are poor flyers and generally regarded as ground dwellers, but can indeed manage to get up to the tops of trees, apparently in a series of short hops/flights where they dwell at night.<p>
Me again I'm afraid.<p>
What about if the flying ability of the animal is somewhere between that of an eagle and a kiwi? <p>
I'm thinking specifically of the Lyrebird. They are poor flyers and generally regarded as ground dwellers, but can indeed manage to get up to the tops of trees, apparently in a series of short hops/flights where they dwell at night.<p>
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
As long as you didn't walk around and around in circles to get up the meters, close enough. The requirement is more about getting out there into the country side than an exercise in great circle maths.Coffee and Cache wrote:Re: The 1500m
<p>
I have hidden a cache that we walked over 2km to place, however, I have discovered a shorter route which is marginal - about 1400m.<p>
So, the question is, does the shortest route have to be >= 1500m or is it sufficient that one uses the longer route to hide or find the cache?
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
We've allowed chickens so I think a lyrebird would fit into that category.Coffee and Cache wrote:Re: Badminton
Me again I'm afraid.<p>
What about if the flying ability of the animal is somewhere between that of an eagle and a kiwi? <p>
I'm thinking specifically of the Lyrebird. They are poor flyers and generally regarded as ground dwellers, but can indeed manage to get up to the tops of trees, apparently in a series of short hops/flights where they dwell at night.<p>
- Coffee and Cache
- 2200 or more geocaches found
- Posts: 183
- Joined: 27 January 07 3:35 pm
- Location: Surrey Hills, Victoria
- tronador
- 6500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
- Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW
I'm a little confused. This is what the rules state but it appears that if you finish earlier than someone else then this determines your position in the ladder????? So it is a race???????In the event that there are two players with the identical score at the end of the game period, the highest, earliest score will be used as the tiebreaker.
As an example.
Scenario 1:
Player A and B ended the game with the same number of points.
Player A: The highest points total for any requirement was 26.
Player B: The highest points total for any requirement was 20.
Player A is deemed to be the winner as they claimed the highest number of points against a single requirement than Player B.
Scenario 2:
Congratulations by the way to those that have finished, it's no mean feat!!!!
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
It's not strictly speaking, a race, however where there are equal points then the date on which the highest points were claimed is a factor.
The date you finish or the number of caches you took to get to the end is not a factor in determining the position on the ladder.
As per the example, if you both get the same points, the highest points, earliest claim is the decider.
It may be coincidental that the positions look like they are lining up with dates and number of finds, but that's not the case. It IS a coincidence.
The date you finish or the number of caches you took to get to the end is not a factor in determining the position on the ladder.
As per the example, if you both get the same points, the highest points, earliest claim is the decider.
It may be coincidental that the positions look like they are lining up with dates and number of finds, but that's not the case. It IS a coincidence.
- tronador
- 6500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
- Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW
Thanks for the clarification.... I undrstand and once again Congrats to those that did so well.caughtatwork wrote:It's not strictly speaking, a race, however where there are equal points then the date on which the highest points were claimed is a factor.
The date you finish or the number of caches you took to get to the end is not a factor in determining the position on the ladder.
As per the example, if you both get the same points, the highest points, earliest claim is the decider.
It may be coincidental that the positions look like they are lining up with dates and number of finds, but that's not the case. It IS a coincidence.
- Bewilderbeest
- 2000 or more caches found
- Posts: 955
- Joined: 24 December 06 4:18 pm
- Location: Canberra
Basketball
Is an average ("regular") ammo can >= 6 litres? (too spatially challenged to mentally compare a sphere with a box and ascertain volume! )
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17017
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Basketball
No, it's not. A .30 calibre can is around 2 litres and a .50 calibre is around 3 litres. I know this because I stash a sistema of appropriate size in each of those can sizes when I hide a new cache.svn07 wrote:Is an average ("regular") ammo can >= 6 litres? (too spatially challenged to mentally compare a sphere with a box and ascertain volume! )
-
- 500 or more caches logged
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 30 November 07 11:06 am
- Location: Carseldine, Brisbane
- tronador
- 6500 or more caches found
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: 04 November 05 10:18 pm
- Location: Lidcombe,Sydney, NSW
caughtatwork wrote:Sorry, but no. The word needs to appear as a word unto itself.Gwennie1984 wrote:For #13 Gymnastics 13 - Find and log a physical cache that has the words floor, beam, ring, bar or vault in the cache name in order to claim this requirement.
Does it count if the word ring is within the cache name but not on its own, ie. keyring?