norkmeister wrote:You know I had that exact reaction to your suggestion about the gnome representing the caching identity....SamWalkers wrote:I cannot wait to see Norkmeisters enrtry.
??
norkmeister wrote:You know I had that exact reaction to your suggestion about the gnome representing the caching identity....SamWalkers wrote:I cannot wait to see Norkmeisters enrtry.
OHMYGOD.SamWalkers wrote:
??
Too much pressure.tronador wrote:Can't wait to see Sam Walkers cheeky gnomes!!! After all i would expect nothing less then a good laugh after mobility Stealth.
Agree. My containers inside the gnome are film canisters, so they'll be listed as micro.tronador wrote:In my opinion, if the container is a micro then list it as a micro.
Hmmm... not sure if I agree.caughtatwork wrote:Agree. My containers inside the gnome are film canisters, so they'll be listed as micro.tronador wrote:In my opinion, if the container is a micro then list it as a micro.
Yep, I see your point there, but in that case I am looking for a container, not a log.caughtatwork wrote:If I hide a hollowed out log (which I have done and will do again), is the log the cache or is the container inside the log the cache?
I can honestly see both sides and you are free to do as you see fit, but I would always list the actual container as the cache size, not necessarily the device used to hide the container.
Or clothe herblossom* wrote:you can always paint a bit more clothing onto herPrincessDiala wrote: She's a little scantly clad for what I want to use her for...
I agree. I will be listing mine as per the size of the gnome.pwags wrote:With the GeGnome Project, I'm looking for gnomes, not film canisters.