GPS under trees

Discussion about software such as GSAK, OziExplorer etc, as well as all things hardware, GPSrs, laptops, PDAs, paperless caching, cables etc
Post Reply
martismo
1 or more caches found
1 or more caches found
Posts: 5
Joined: 13 September 03 10:07 pm
Location: Ingham

GPS under trees

Post by martismo » 17 January 07 12:58 pm

Are some GPS's better under tree cover or are they all fairly useless. I have a base model Garmin Etrex and would love to have coverage when trails go into forest but alas....

Hope you have some suggestions.

User avatar
Webguy
2100 or more geocaches found
2100 or more geocaches found
Posts: 938
Joined: 10 May 04 2:19 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by Webguy » 17 January 07 1:35 pm

In a car, or on foot?

In a car, a re-radiating antenna works wonders.

On foot, the newer Sirf III chip based etrex models do a better job under denser tree cover.

User avatar
Map Monkey
1050 or more caches found
1050 or more caches found
Posts: 2214
Joined: 08 April 04 3:06 pm
Location: Banana Republic
Contact:

Post by Map Monkey » 17 January 07 7:45 pm

Hi Martismo,

You must remember that the base model Etrex was originally released in over 7 years ago IIRC and as such is considered old technology (even though they still work OK and are used by many) in comparisons to some of the newer SiRF III chipset models etc.

I find that the newer SiRF III chipsets models will hold the signal for much longer and in lots of cases, continuously, when under tree canopy than the yellow etrex's. Remember that the water content in and around the tree, especially the leaves, is the problem with GPS usage under canopies and as such i find the signal will hold for much longer in the afternoon (allows leaves to dry) and in the drier months. :P I normally tend to record tracklogs and waypoints for future reference in Search and Rescue towards September/October as there has been a relatively (well for up North :wink: ) dry period and walk the tracks late afternoon which also makes for great sunsets. 8)

The other thing to remember is that the GPS will track better when it still has a signal rather than trying to re-establish a signal. I find it ideal to establish a strong signal before going into less-than-ideal signal areas, and will wait some time (5min +) before continuing. Many people will only turn their GPSr on AFTER getting to their GZ and find that they cannot obtain any signal in most cases. Better to turn it on BEFOREhand, and hold the GPS unit for optimal reception (horizontal in your case) whilst traversing these areas.

mm

User avatar
sirius Tas
3500 or more caches found
3500 or more caches found
Posts: 268
Joined: 13 June 06 7:36 am
Location: Ulverstone Tasmania

gps under trees

Post by sirius Tas » 14 February 07 10:28 am

Hi Martismo,
As a surveyor for Forestry Tas have been using GPS for over 10 years...what Map Monkey has said is 100% correct.
Get your GPSr receiving before you enter under canopy...what you need to bear in mind is that when a GPSr first fires up it has to hold lock on individual sats for approx. 30 seconds each which is far easier out in the open...but once lock is obtained and GPSr kept on it can lose lock and regain lock whenever it gets a strong enough signal.
Also spot on re wet canopy...GPS signals wont penetrate wet canopies as easily and if near radiata pine...forget it if wet..totally useless even with high end GPSrs.
Cheers

Ebenezer
150 or more caches found
150 or more caches found
Posts: 425
Joined: 03 June 03 5:12 pm
Location: Summer Hill, Sydney
Contact:

Post by Ebenezer » 14 February 07 7:28 pm

Webguy wrote: On foot, the newer Sirf III chip based etrex models do a better job under denser tree cover.
Do any of the eTrex models have Sirf III? I have a Venture Cx, and I don't think it has it.

User avatar
Richary
8000 or more caches found
8000 or more caches found
Posts: 4189
Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
Location: Waitara, Sydney

Post by Richary » 14 February 07 11:18 pm

I don't know what chipset the Foretrex (wrist mount one) uses, but it seems to hold the signal better than the eTrex under tree cover.

User avatar
Team Wibble
2100 or more geocaches found
2100 or more geocaches found
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 October 04 11:47 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by Team Wibble » 15 February 07 8:16 am

richary wrote:I don't know what chipset the Foretrex (wrist mount one) uses, but it seems to hold the signal better than the eTrex under tree cover.
I have to agree. I don't know what chipset the foretrex uses either, but on several occasions where we've had that and a yellow Etrex, the foretrex consistently gets better reception, especially under cover.

Post Reply