Stats Graphs

Discussion about the Geocaching Australia web site
User avatar
setsujoku
3500 or more caches found
3500 or more caches found
Posts: 1422
Joined: 28 December 04 5:46 pm
Twitter: BGNWP
Location: Athelstone, SA
Contact:

Post by setsujoku » 21 November 06 9:06 pm

by the start of next week it will be a picture of a pommy flag attached to a plane flying out of australia :D :D :D

User avatar
The Spindoctors
Posts: 1767
Joined: 08 October 03 8:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by The Spindoctors » 19 April 08 11:23 am

Are the graphs broken? I can't see to get any result from them?

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by caughtatwork » 19 April 08 11:37 am

If you're using caughtatwork.net, select the stats, select the graph, hit submit.

There are some 1,000,000 log rows and 10,000 caches plus some godawful number of cachers as well.

As such, in order to find the "highest / fastest / biggest" is needs to collate everything together into a big array and the find the top 50.

This might take a minute, or even two or three. Unless you are getting a broken image tag, it just takes a while nowadays with so much data.

If you can tell me specificlly which state / graph I'll check it out.

User avatar
homedg
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
Posts: 798
Joined: 24 February 06 3:15 pm
Location: South West Sydney

Post by homedg » 21 April 08 1:14 am

So does that mean that I can still press 1 button and get all the info?

The stats and graphs are great, I just used to enjoy when I could click, wait, and scoll through all the results.

It's always good to see what's happening in the real world. ;)

Appreciate your work.

User avatar
Big Matt and Shell
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 1905
Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
Twitter: BigMattandShell
Contact:

Post by Big Matt and Shell » 21 April 08 1:39 am

homedg wrote:So does that mean that I can still press 1 button and get all the info?

The stats and graphs are great, I just used to enjoy when I could click, wait, and scoll through all the results.

It's always good to see what's happening in the real world. ;)

Appreciate your work.
<P>
I used to like this method as well but I can see that it would have been intensive on the server<P>I have noticed that there have been a few graphs drop off as well. There used to be a graph that showed the number of finds by cachers in a state by current month and current year. Any plans on this making a return?

User avatar
homedg
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
Posts: 798
Joined: 24 February 06 3:15 pm
Location: South West Sydney

Post by homedg » 21 April 08 2:12 am

I also loved looking at stats based on the cachers State of origin.
BUT IT'S NOT ABOUT THE NUMBERS
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

User avatar
setsujoku
3500 or more caches found
3500 or more caches found
Posts: 1422
Joined: 28 December 04 5:46 pm
Twitter: BGNWP
Location: Athelstone, SA
Contact:

Post by setsujoku » 21 April 08 10:31 am

homedg wrote:I also loved looking at stats based on the cachers State of origin.
Go the crow eaters :!:

oh sorry, wrong state of origin :D

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by caughtatwork » 21 April 08 5:13 pm

homedg wrote:So does that mean that I can still press 1 button and get all the info?

The stats and graphs are great, I just used to enjoy when I could click, wait, and scoll through all the results.

It's always good to see what's happening in the real world. ;)

Appreciate your work.
Unfortunately this can't be accommodated any more :-(
I'm sad about it too.
The drain on the server was simply too much, pushing 4 CPU's to the limit for some number of minutes (in some cases when more than one person was there, 10-20 minutes).

User avatar
Big Matt and Shell
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 1905
Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
Twitter: BigMattandShell
Contact:

Post by Big Matt and Shell » 21 April 08 7:46 pm

homedg wrote:I also loved looking at stats based on the cachers State of origin.
BUT IT'S NOT ABOUT THE NUMBERS
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
<P>No never, why else do we plan on significant caches for our milestones. Try telling maccamob or dak it isn't about the numbers...

User avatar
The Spindoctors
Posts: 1767
Joined: 08 October 03 8:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by The Spindoctors » 21 April 08 8:57 pm

homedg wrote: BUT IT'S NOT ABOUT THE NUMBERS
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Hey! How else can I make up questions for the podcast? LOL :lol:

Post Reply