Geocaching Australia

Same issue with trying to publish as well or edit a cache.

Please try again.

Many thanks for rectifying what ever was the issue. Working fine now. Thank you.

All good here as well...

All's well - been doin' the washin' so just logged on. Thanks.

Just logged back in and all is well. Thank you.

Just noticed a field perhaps not big enough on display as OldSaint has 1000 hides but it only shows 1 for them on the following page.

https://geocaching.com.au/cacher/OldSaint/hides/

Thanks for that. For a reason I can't quite figure, it was treating the , as a decimal separator and so the display integer was just the first number. Weird. Changed it to display as a string rather than an integer.

I'm getting GCA emails marked as SPAM in my gmail recently.
not sure if anything has changed on the host but was working fine for several years until the last month or two.

thanks

mtrax wrote: ↑

20 December 20 8:24 am

I'm getting GCA emails marked as SPAM in my gmail recently.
not sure if anything has changed on the host but was working fine for several years until the last month or two.

thanks

Mines still ok.

Just keep marking them as 'not spam' and gmail should get the message and stop flagging it as spam for your account eventually. Not a lot we can do at this end, sorry!

TP13155
I can't deploy points to this trig.

One thread is enough, we see all. The answer is in the other thread you opened. You should have no problems now.

My new multi GA20860 https://geocaching.com.au/cache/ga20860 is doing something weird. The description was showing yesterday on the website however today it isn't. It shows on my GA app which I just updated now and on GSAK according to Tuena (who I have to thank for highlighting this issue).

The issue has been addressed.

There was a conflict between the permission indicator and the fact that the listed co-ordinates are inside a NSW Parks area. This has now been addressed and should show correctly as you have acknowledged that the final is not inside NSW Parks areas.

Thank you.

Interesting because I couldn't publish it till I agreed that it wasn't in an NP when asked.