"Swimming against the tide" graph

Discussion about the Geocaching Australia web site
Post Reply
Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

"Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Laighside Legends » 22 May 12 8:21 pm

There is a graph called "Swimming against the tide" that shows the number of unfound home state caches over time. Unless you find at least about 100 caches a months it just goes up and up...

Is it possible to make a "Swimming against the freddo tide" graph? Same as above but just for freddo caches. I think I'm keeping up but only just... :D

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by caughtatwork » 22 May 12 9:01 pm

Sorry, no.

Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Laighside Legends » 22 May 12 9:16 pm

Is that just because you don't know the number for each month in the past (or is too hard to work out)?

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by caughtatwork » 22 May 12 9:43 pm

I have a computer. I can do anything.

What I fail to see is the widespread attraction to a graph that charts a cachers finds against Freddos hides.

This might give an indication of people who might be interested in running that graph. http://geocaching.com.au/cacher/Freddo/frequentfinders

You're only in the Obsessed Frequent Finders rank so your chart would a show that you're losing against an overwhelming tide of Freddo caches.

Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Laighside Legends » 22 May 12 9:52 pm

It doesn't have to be just Freddo, I was kinda thinking like the "Battlegraph" where you enter the relevant cacher in...
But if its too hard then never mind, just a thought...

And considering that when I started caching he had 250+ hides I would say I'm going that badly... :mrgreen:

User avatar
MtnLioness
2800 or more caches found
2800 or more caches found
Posts: 875
Joined: 12 May 09 5:50 pm
Location: Seaton, Adelaide
Contact:

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by MtnLioness » 22 May 12 10:45 pm

8)

User avatar
Bewilderbeest
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 955
Joined: 24 December 06 4:18 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Bewilderbeest » 23 May 12 9:19 am

Laighside Legends wrote:There is a graph called "Swimming against the tide" that shows the number of unfound home state caches over time. Unless you find at least about 100 caches a months it just goes up and up...
On a related subject, can you explain to me what the "Olympicas Downhill" graph is showing? I cant quite get my head around it...

Laighside Legends
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
Posts: 1304
Joined: 05 October 10 10:20 pm
Location: Australia

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Laighside Legends » 23 May 12 10:41 am

Bewilderbeest wrote:
Laighside Legends wrote:There is a graph called "Swimming against the tide" that shows the number of unfound home state caches over time. Unless you find at least about 100 caches a months it just goes up and up...
On a related subject, can you explain to me what the "Olympicas Downhill" graph is showing? I cant quite get my head around it...
Same but just for within 50km of your home coords

User avatar
Bewilderbeest
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 955
Joined: 24 December 06 4:18 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Bewilderbeest » 23 May 12 11:12 am

So how come the Tide almost always goes up, but the Downhill always goes down (well, never goes up)?

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17017
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by caughtatwork » 23 May 12 11:49 am

Downhill is active caches within 50km, assuming they were all hidden on 1/1/2000.
Then you look at the month you found the cache and 1 comes off the list.
A steep slop means you are tacking many caches in your area.
A not-so-steep slope means you are letting the ones within 50km build up.
A flat line would be you don't care (or you're dead).
It's more for fun than anything else.

User avatar
Bewilderbeest
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 955
Joined: 24 December 06 4:18 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: "Swimming against the tide" graph

Post by Bewilderbeest » 23 May 12 12:44 pm

caughtatwork wrote:Downhill is active caches within 50km, assuming they were all hidden on 1/1/2000....
It's more for fun than anything else.
Ah, thank you. Its that date hidden assumption that I hadnt worked out.

Its certainly more encouraging than Swimming Against the Tide!

Post Reply