Geocaching Australia

It is, of course, your decision.

I like No_Tomorrow. I"m used to it, anyway, but it sounds like a challenge. Something you yell at the world, like the Doctor shouts, "Geronimo!!"

And you may have guessed from my user name, but clever witty ideas is not my forte. Sorry.

Wendy

Thanks for doing the checking, C@W! I appreciate that it must be hard work, and time consuming. I am happy to go with the percentage that shows now. You should know, however, that last week my percentage said at least 83%. I think a bit more. It has been creeping up slowly from the time of my last '...

Yes, Black Bunny and me, too. I thought it was my bad memory, but I couldn't shake the feeling. Ours went from about 82% to around 73%, I think, but I can't be sure.

When we first signed up, we chose the clan with the fewest members. It made sense at the time. :) Re movables: I have been guilty. We used to think it was great fun to hand them off to the next player, in a bag....until the 'players' left us out and then moved them out of state. I am sorry to think ...

No_Tomorrow: Nothing personal - it was just something that came to mind. It was a long time ago. I fondly remember some of the caches you put out, and we found.

Goldenwattle, I hear you. I often feel that the game is uneven. I think it's a matter of how closely the members of a clan are clustered in one district, and how much they work together. I remember when the blues were the fewest, and we pulled together (in Canberra at least) and made things change. ...

I received my pathtag yesterday, and wanted to say thank you to the organisers of the Battleships game. Then I thought again. I thought about all the hours and hard work Caught@work puts in, over days and weeks and years, without much thanks - and for free. AFTER a full day's work at his other job, ...

I enjoyed the game. I too enjoyed the element of chance. We did reach a point where there just weren't enough suitable caches available within reach, but I assume that most players would have had a similar issue. I like the sense of belonging that I get when we all join in on a game. Unfortunately, ...

Thank you. We do appreciate your hard work.

Thanks for your feedback on our comments, C@W. I am eager to be part of any future promotion of the GA site, but I do not know what is acceptable, and what would tread on toes. I believe the main competition - and most complaints - would be from GC. Does anyone know what rules they have in place tha...

Okay, I've had my thinking cap on. I know my thinking capacity is reduced due to illness, so be gentle with me. :) Rough idea: I thought we could have a sort of voting competition. My idea is to have a list of categories. I suggest we have a form that people can make nominations for their favourite ...

First, I feel I must apologise for all the pr*cks out there who have abused anyone involved in organising any of our caching stuff, including games. I also apologise if anything I have ever said or done has come across as abuse to the organisers. I also want to thank you for all your hard work. I am...

Thanks, Caught@work, for your prompt and clear response.

I am disappointed that it is necessary to allow for potential cheating, and I hadn't considered it, but I do see the sad necessity, now that it's been pointed out to me.

I must be stupid or naive, or both. I appreciate everybody's patience.

I have read the rules for the upcoming game of Battleships.

I just need to clarify one point: If I HIDE a cache, it has to be during the game period, but if people want to FIND that cache, their find(s) won't qualify as part of the game?

Thanks for your patience, in advance.

LuckyL10n: I don't mind finding a movable more than once, as long as it has been moved so it's a 'new' location, and therefore a 'new' find - that's my personal preference. I don't mind how others play, though. I certainly don't think it's very sporting to find non-moving caches multiple times.