How close is too close
- weewillie
- 1 or more caches found
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 16 December 05 8:56 am
- Location: Marsden - Logan - Queensland
How close is too close
Hi All,
near where I live is a path that winds through bushland for several kms and looks like a prime setup for a caching trail. But the quandry is how close is too close between caches?
near where I live is a path that winds through bushland for several kms and looks like a prime setup for a caching trail. But the quandry is how close is too close between caches?
Re: How close is too close
According to the cache placement guidelines on Geocaching.com (assuming you aren't talking about Geocaching.com.au caches where the rules are different):
Cache Saturation
Cache containers and physical stages should generally be separated by a minimum of 0.1 miles (528 feet or 161 m). A physical stage is defined as any stage that contains a physical element placed by the geocache owner, such as a tag with the next set of coordinates or a container. Non-physical caches or stages including reference points, trailhead/parking coordinates and question to answer waypoints are exempt from this guideline.
Re: How close is too close
I would ask yourself the question what am I trying to showcase with this cache? There is not a lot of merit (IMHO) in just placing a cache every few hundred metres along a nice path.
If there are certain spots of interest such as a great view, interesting plants or a spot you always hear lots of little birds, then those spots can merit a cache along the path.
Of course, you can always make it a multi so people need to follow the waypoints along the trail but I do recognise that multis are not always so popular (or easy to maintain)
Otherwise, put one at each end (or close to it) and one in the middle to ensure people walk between them to enjoy the bush along the way. But do keep in mind that if your car is at one end, you have to somehow get back to it, so the walk will be twice the length of the pathway which can be a fair way for some people and children.
If there are certain spots of interest such as a great view, interesting plants or a spot you always hear lots of little birds, then those spots can merit a cache along the path.
Of course, you can always make it a multi so people need to follow the waypoints along the trail but I do recognise that multis are not always so popular (or easy to maintain)
Otherwise, put one at each end (or close to it) and one in the middle to ensure people walk between them to enjoy the bush along the way. But do keep in mind that if your car is at one end, you have to somehow get back to it, so the walk will be twice the length of the pathway which can be a fair way for some people and children.
- Papa Bear_Left
- 800 or more hollow logs searched
- Posts: 2573
- Joined: 03 April 03 12:28 am
- Location: Kalamunda, WA
- Contact:
Re: How close is too close
General rule: if the only reason for placing a cache at a given location is the cache itself, not the location, then don't place the cache.
Re: How close is too close
Shame a lot of placers never heed that reason.Papa Bear_Left wrote:General rule: if the only reason for placing a cache at a given location is the cache itself, not the location, then don't place the cache.
- Richary
- 8000 or more caches found
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
- Location: Waitara, Sydney
Re: How close is too close
I found one this morning that was a perfect example of that. A film canister behind a small tree against a fence in a boring park (nothing there but a tennis court) opposite a suburban shopping centre. Still it fulfilled it's purpose - I needed a find for Feb 12, so an easy one after I had to work and in the rain was probably better than a longish walk and hunting through the wet bush.
Of course, given the right conditions a nice walk and challenging hide would normally be much higher up the list.
EDIT: Can we get that put on the cache placement guidelines that in theory people read at least the first time they place one?
Of course, given the right conditions a nice walk and challenging hide would normally be much higher up the list.
EDIT: Can we get that put on the cache placement guidelines that in theory people read at least the first time they place one?
Re: How close is too close
You could have picked up a gnome in my back street for your Feb 12th find http://geocaching.com.au/cache/ga2964Richary wrote:I found one this morning that was a perfect example of that. A film canister behind a small tree against a fence in a boring park (nothing there but a tennis court) opposite a suburban shopping centre. Still it fulfilled it's purpose - I needed a find for Feb 12, so an easy one after I had to work and in the rain was probably better than a longish walk and hunting through the wet bush.
- Richary
- 8000 or more caches found
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
- Location: Waitara, Sydney
Re: How close is too close
I've still got 5 of the little guys (or not so little) to hide somewhere. Might be heading eastern suburbs tomorrow if the weather isn't too bad. Got World Cache to finish off.blossom* wrote:You could have picked up a gnome in my back street for your Feb 12th find http://geocaching.com.au/cache/ga2964
-
- 10000 or more caches found
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 25 January 10 9:35 pm
- Location: Lenah Valley
Re: How close is too close
I have a question. What should you do if you find two gc mystery caches are within 80 metres of each other. Should you tell the ump?
- Bronnie_1990
- 1000 or more caches found
- Posts: 681
- Joined: 21 September 10 4:20 pm
- Twitter: bronnie1990
- Location: Tuggeranong, Canberra.
Re: How close is too close
Nah, considering he approves caches, before publishing, to make sure they arent too close to each other, it's ok.
For mystery caches, the location that it displays, as a rule, isnt where the cache is located, therefore, mysteries dont have that rule apply to them.
For mystery caches, the location that it displays, as a rule, isnt where the cache is located, therefore, mysteries dont have that rule apply to them.
-
- 10000 or more caches found
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 25 January 10 9:35 pm
- Location: Lenah Valley
Re: How close is too close
Sorry. I have found both caches a they are phyiscally 80 metres from each other.
Re: How close is too close
If they were both published after about late 2006, then I wouldn't mind having a look at them, just to see if someone's been moving their GZ around a bit freely.budgietas wrote:I have a question. What should you do if you find two gc mystery caches are within 80 metres of each other. Should you tell the ump?
If at least one of them is quite old (in geocaching terms, at least), then it probably pre-dated the "additional waypoints" feature and a newer one was allowed nearby because the reviewer didn't know about the older one.
In that case, I'm inclined to consider them grandfathered. It's disappointing for cachers to be taken back to the same place when they solve the second mystery cache (but they should be used to that, with plenty of other cachers carefully measuring 162m gaps to shoehorn one more cache into the same park!)
-
- 2350 or more caches found
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 11 February 10 5:30 pm
- Location: Springwood
Re: How close is too close
I placed a cache earlier last year, a multi, when I'd only been caching for two months. The cache was approved. Later in the year I did an old multi in Parramatta which, when GZ was calculated, took me to within a hundred metres of my own cache in the mountains. Naturally I had had no idea this multi was there, and I was curious as to why mine had been approved. I later came to the conclusion theUMP outlines, that the age of the multi meant additional waypoints had not been recorded.
While I might be biased, I personally think it would be a pity to remove my own cache, since it has had a lot of positive feedback and some favourite votes, but I think anyone would agree that the proximity problem wasn't my fault. At the time I was amazed there seemed to be no cache at the location. Later I found out.
While I might be biased, I personally think it would be a pity to remove my own cache, since it has had a lot of positive feedback and some favourite votes, but I think anyone would agree that the proximity problem wasn't my fault. At the time I was amazed there seemed to be no cache at the location. Later I found out.
Re: How close is too close
I like bikerbudy's cache best too - becasue I found that one!! We had no luck with the multi and where our gps was pointing looked quite slippery and difficult. Since we weren't sure of the accuracy down there, we didn't risk clambering around for the multi. But really enjoyed the trad of bikerbudy
Re: How close is too close
I've found both of those caches & enjoyed both of them. I didn't realise they were so close together though, it seemed like a longer walk to get the non-bikerbuddy one than just a 100m. Those 2 & the other nearby multi made for a nice afternoon of caching for us.
I think that another new cache that has just popped up in that area might also be pretty close to the original cache. And I would guess that the cache owners of the new one don't know about the other multi due to very distant starting point .
I think that another new cache that has just popped up in that area might also be pretty close to the original cache. And I would guess that the cache owners of the new one don't know about the other multi due to very distant starting point .