View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently 20 October 17 2:28 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
GCA Archiving - A proposal and debate. 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14628
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 293
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post GCA Archiving - A proposal and debate.
A proposal for debate in the senate without notice.

With all the hoohaa going on with the two new cache police members and the archiving of caches from GCA it opens a question to the senate.

GCA is no rules.

That does mean that abandoned or muggled and not maintained caches will remain in the system for ever.

Should we, as a community, lead by our senate, consider an automated method for dealing with caches that should, for all intents and purposes, be archived?

eg.
1 month after a cache is marked as temporarily unavailable, an email is sent to the owner requesting action.
2 months after, a reminder.
3 months after, the cache is automatically archived by the system.
The beauty of GCA is that the owner can at any time, unarchive the cache without permission or intervention by an "appropriate authority".

Another eg.
Same scenario as above, but change temporarily unavailable with SBA.

The first scenario is for active members of the community.
The second would be for caches where the community member may have moved on and has not set the cache to temporarily unavailable.

This is a change in direction for GCA as it would no longer be strictly no rules, but would allow the system to help keep itself clean while still allowing owners to make changes to their cache as needed.

As it's a change in direction, the senate should provide the guidance and governance on these types of questions.

Contributions from people who actively hide / seek caches at GCA will have louder voices in this debate.

Please commence the debate.


06 June 07 12:10 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
450 or more roots tripped over
450 or more roots tripped over

Joined: 30 October 03 9:20 pm
Posts: 1399
GCA Found: 34
GCA Hidden: 57
Post 
As the owner can reverse the action any time and as there is no proximity rule so a new cache will not stop reactivation I have no problem with any of this. At the end of the day it's not really establishing a rule so much as a process. If possible give people the option to turn off "automatic archiving" for there account, they could still get reminders.


06 June 07 7:34 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: 04 April 04 5:01 pm
Posts: 2183
Location: Jannali
GCA Found: 79
GCA Hidden: 7
Post 
I'm all for "Free and Open" but I think as cache placers we have some responsibility for what we are putting out there.
If a cache has been abandoned by the placer and is in severe need of maintenance what use is it to anyone. In some cases the community will step up but some caches are not worth it.
I think putting something in place to clear out the garbage is the responsible thing to do.
Making it automated will take the heat off our volunteers as well as hopefully giving people an incentive to fix the caches involved.


06 June 07 7:54 pm
Profile
200 or more found
200 or more found
User avatar

Joined: 19 July 05 1:34 am
Posts: 119
Location: Australind WA
GCA Found: 3
GCA Hidden: 0
Post 
I agree. I think is should be after a SBA log though.

Regular cachers will police the SBA's and if there is no responce from the owner, then archive them. Further to this, if the SBA message bounces from the registered email account, then archive immediately.

If it's all undo-able then there should be no concerns.


06 June 07 8:12 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
Online
Indentured Slave
User avatar

Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Posts: 6648
Location: Launceston, TAS
GCA Found: 157
GCA Hidden: 44
100 GCA Finds
Post 
As a GCA hider I have no objection, it's not like the cache is deleted (which is why I can't really understand some of the complaints with the recent events on GC....)

I don't see it as anything other than database maintenance, as Mix said, it doesn't effect anything with regards to proximity or anything......


06 June 07 8:20 pm
Profile E-mail ICQ WWW
100 or more tracks walked
100 or more tracks walked
User avatar

Joined: 01 March 05 9:23 pm
Posts: 317
Location: Kootingal near Tamworth NSW
GCA Found: 37
GCA Hidden: 25
Post 
Could it also be set to trigger when it get a number of DNF's a realistic number say 2 which would also give the owner a chance to get the Cache looked at if he or she is unavailable. :?:


06 June 07 8:38 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14628
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 293
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post 
Anything is technically possible.
This is more a debate as to whether it's a good idea on GCA to impose that functionality.
It's your site, please feel free to contribute.


06 June 07 8:56 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
Online
Indentured Slave
User avatar

Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Posts: 6648
Location: Launceston, TAS
GCA Found: 157
GCA Hidden: 44
100 GCA Finds
Post 
I wouldn't support even the notion of auto disabling of active caches in any way... it starts to veer the direction of this site in a direction I wouldn't be too keen on going...

(edited after re-reading the posts above)


06 June 07 9:00 pm
Profile E-mail ICQ WWW
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14628
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 293
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post 
CraigRat wrote:
I wouldn't support even the notion of auto disabling of active caches in any way... it starts to veer the direction of this site in a direction I wouldn't be too keen on going...

(edited after re-reading the posts above)


What if it's got 6 DNF and 3 SBA, yet is still "active" because the cacher has moved on?

Sure, if the SBA has been responded to with a Maintained, then I'm with you. It's also how we feel about abandoned listings that are still nominally active yet are also probably no longer there.


06 June 07 9:14 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
Online
Indentured Slave
User avatar

Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Posts: 6648
Location: Launceston, TAS
GCA Found: 157
GCA Hidden: 44
100 GCA Finds
Post 
caughtatwork wrote:
What if it's got 6 DNF and 3 SBA, yet is still "active" because the cacher has moved on?


I'd rather see a human make the ultimate decision on active caches... possibly a good reason to have a senate?? dunno...


06 June 07 9:22 pm
Profile E-mail ICQ WWW
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14628
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 293
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post 
Good point.
Would the senate take on the role of individual caches?
Dunno.


06 June 07 10:14 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
Totally Clueless(tm)

Joined: 28 March 03 8:05 pm
Posts: 779
Location: Launceston, Tasmania
GCA Found: 31
GCA Hidden: 13
Post 
Postman Pat wrote:
Could it also be set to trigger when it get a number of DNF's a realistic number say 2 which would also give the owner a chance to get the Cache looked at if he or she is unavailable. :?:


The owner of this "cache" might not like that approach 8)


06 June 07 10:25 pm
Profile E-mail ICQ WWW
450 or more roots tripped over
450 or more roots tripped over

Joined: 10 August 04 12:26 pm
Posts: 1232
Location: Yarra Ranges
GCA Found: 20
GCA Hidden: 0
Post 
Another proposal:
after X DNFs by X different users it gets a needs repair for X months then if none is forthcoming it goes up for adoption on a first come first served basis then after another X months its then archived if no adopte steps up.


06 June 07 10:51 pm
Profile
750 or more caches found
750 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 29 December 03 11:37 pm
Posts: 559
Location: Lakes Entrance
GCA Found: 0
GCA Hidden: 0
Post 
Sounds GCA is getting rules...

DJ


06 June 07 11:45 pm
Profile E-mail ICQ WWW
It's the journey.
It's the journey.
User avatar

Joined: 04 April 03 6:30 pm
Posts: 3444
Location: Land Grant of John Campbell
GCA Found: 65
GCA Hidden: 4
Post 
The idea is sound. An automated email is a nice touch. As for archiving caches if the email bounces, if the bounced forum notifications are anything to go by, a lot of caches will be archived.


06 June 07 11:49 pm
Profile E-mail
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Forum theme by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.