[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/bbcode.php on line 121: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/bbcode.php on line 121: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/bbcode.php on line 121: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
Geocaching Australia - View topic - Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently 19 August 17 8:19 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events" 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14539
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1040
GCA Hidden: 265
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
OMG. It's like I'm invisible down here with my head stuck in the sand.
viewtopic.php?p=194235#p194235


27 April 12 5:09 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
User avatar

Joined: 03 July 10 3:01 am
Posts: 568
Location: Northside, Canberra, Australia
GCA Found: 1825
GCA Hidden: 19
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
I see you C@W. I hear what you're saying. I just don't know what we can do about it.
I don't think we should promote GC stuff, particularly, but I didn't have a problem with it, until THEY obviously started to have a problem with it. Why should we give them free plugs (and/or a reason to get upset)?

I sort of hoped that we could all play nicely together, but that obviously isn't going to happen. I would like to be able to say we can do without GC, but I don't think GA is big enough yet, for most of us to use it exclusively.

For what it's worth (not much, I know!), I'd LIKE to be able to divorce GA from GC totally, as soon as it's practical, and not rock the boat in the meantime.


27 April 12 6:04 pm
Profile E-mail

Joined: 04 December 10 10:30 am
Posts: 73
Location: sydney
GCA Found: 5
GCA Hidden: 0
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
caughtatwork wrote:
To avoid any Mega-Event from being "delisted", I'm proposing that Geocaching Australia, including the site forums, will now ban, with extreme prejudice any and all references to Mega-Event activity. We will also remove any reference to a Mega-Event on any cache listing page, list of upcoming events, etc, etc.

This is a proposal, discuss away.


Is there anything to discuss really. This is not a dummy spit by gca. You would only promote a mega-event on GCA if there was some acknowledgement by the organisers of your support. If they won't (or can't because they would be de-listed), then tuff on them. The organisers need to put pressure on gc.com to pull their head in. As it stands, it seems that gc.com don't need gca to support mega-events because of the mega resources gc.com put into the promotion of them.

Besides, imagine being told when selling your car, if you list your ad in the fairfax press, the murdoch press would pull your ad from their paper (or vice versa). gc.com is just a listing service. they dont own the caches or events.

I therefore agree that the mods should shut them down.


28 April 12 12:32 am
Profile E-mail
6000 or more caches found
6000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
Posts: 3966
Location: Waitara, Sydney
GCA Found: 1284
GCA Hidden: 22
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
rinsemesocks wrote:
caughtatwork wrote:
To avoid any Mega-Event from being "delisted", I'm proposing that Geocaching Australia, including the site forums, will now ban, with extreme prejudice any and all references to Mega-Event activity. We will also remove any reference to a Mega-Event on any cache listing page, list of upcoming events, etc, etc.

This is a proposal, discuss away.


Is there anything to discuss really. This is not a dummy spit by gca. You would only promote a mega-event on GCA if there was some acknowledgement by the organisers of your support. If they won't (or can't because they would be de-listed), then tuff on them. The organisers need to put pressure on gc.com to pull their head in. As it stands, it seems that gc.com don't need gca to support mega-events because of the mega resources gc.com put into the promotion of them.


I think GC do need GCA to promote a mega as a lot of people find out about it here. Do you read the emails GC send every week with the latest updates? I don't. And it seems like a dummy spit by GCA to ban any talk of a mega that is listed on GC. That said I understand that C@W and craigrat are coming from different directions here.

We have forums that GC has no control over, if they want to delist an event because someone has dared to talk about a mega on another site they will achieve nothing except to make sure there are no megas as they will simply piss people off. And they would need to monitor a lot more than here (though we are one of the few listing sites as well).

Yes, maybe we can't promote it as C@W says with special listings on the front page or mailouts. But then again GC need to pull their heads out of the sand and realise that what is/has been done on this site has helped them get the numbers to the mega. And also that posting things on here isn't diminishing their user base, anyone who is already here to see it is most likely a GC cacher anyway. I don't know of any exclusive GCA finders who aren't already on the other site.


28 April 12 1:26 am
Profile E-mail

Joined: 04 December 10 10:30 am
Posts: 73
Location: sydney
GCA Found: 5
GCA Hidden: 0
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
It is the principle of it, and this will be the thin edge of the wedge. It will move on to events and other things. Why promote directly their so-called event for no acknowledgment.

If people who use the gc.com service feel miffed about not posting about megas on gca, then complain to gc.com who started it by not being clear.


28 April 12 9:32 am
Profile E-mail
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 29 August 10 1:36 pm
Posts: 328
Location: Hampton, Victoria, Australia
GCA Found: 175
GCA Hidden: 10
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
roundcircle wrote:
CraigRat wrote:
It should be said that Opencaching.com whilst owned by a commercial company does NOT charge for any of it's services and is therefore not a financial competitor to groundspeak on ANY level, this new ruling from them locks out ALL community based listing sites from being mentioned in anything significant to do with any MEGA. There are no other for-profit geocaching sites out there.

This statement is not correct.

1st. The company that runs the MadCacher blog has recently acquired NaviCache. So there are three "profit" based listing sites. That we're aware of anyway.
http://www.madcacher.com/new/navicache-com-acquisition/

2nd. One of groundspeaks revenue streams is advertising. Anything that pulls traffic away from GC.com reduces that revenue stream. Open caching does this to GC. And in A/NZ, GCA would have a significant impact on that revenue stream.

With the mainstream growth of the hobby, GC will need to be constantly vigilant about new threats to their business model. Mind you, the threat to pull "Mega" status has it's own risks. If they were to do that, it might actually drive a large group away quickly.


I am a tad confused about the advertising part. Half the advertising on GC.com would have to be to their own shops. They couldn't make too much from advertising on the site, seriously.

Also, has Matt got a reply from Groundspeak yet? I am following this thread heavily and despite only being 14yo, I am quite interested in this whole aspect of things. All arguments are valid as I see it. At the moment, anyway.


28 April 12 10:02 am
Profile E-mail
1700 or more caches found
1700 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 28 September 05 9:02 am
Posts: 238
GCA Found: 131
GCA Hidden: 7
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
My 1.5c

GCA, is an important part of the way I play the game - We load GCA caches along side GC based caches etc....

In my 5sec of fame at Wagga when we won a 6th prize and was handed the microphone on stage, our thanks included GCA for the effort that goes into it. We really enjoyed the gnomes etc. I read and at times contribute to the forums etc. At Albury we had our own GCA event which was well attended for what it was, our event was on the web site and an announcement was made just prior to its commencement with the updated location.

I am disappointed in GC's policy, In my view Groundspeak should be encouraging caching communities and "local" organisations and their activities, it promotes and enhances the game which in turn leads to more caching activity and diversity.

caughtatwork wrote:
I think the Albury guys were lucky the GCA shop didn't turn up with our big banner and tent [-X


I think GCA should have been there and at the time wondered why it wasn't...

If and if and if... If GCA was there I would have supported it, if GCA is at SA Mega? or at NZ and we attend? and I would happily put my name forward to roster on / help out.

Future Mega's need to have the conversation with Groundspeak, true but is there a way to not bury our heads in the sand? Individuals write to them with concern? or as a group?


28 April 12 10:54 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14539
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1040
GCA Hidden: 265
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"


28 April 12 12:32 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
1100 or more caches found
1100 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 06 10:10 pm
Posts: 396
Location: Ballarat
GCA Found: 47
GCA Hidden: 2
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"


28 April 12 12:52 pm
Profile
6000 or more caches found
6000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
Posts: 3966
Location: Waitara, Sydney
GCA Found: 1284
GCA Hidden: 22
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
caughtatwork wrote:
This leaves the daily emailer in question. Any cache in the daily emailer provides a link back to the GCA website. I would construe that as a "sponsored link". i.e. GCA is using the GC Mega-Event information to drive traffic to the GCA website.

....

We would remove all GC information from the daily emailer. New, changed, etc. i.e. The daily emailer would be GCA cache listings only.


I can understand this point of view, as of course GCA is not beholden to promote GC or any other listing site other than our own. And while the email does point back to our site, if people want to see the cache details they still need to click on the link to go to GC.

However this would be a big change. While I get new cache notifications from GC being a premium member, I also enjoy reading the summary that turns up with the GCA email each morning as it shows new caches in my state that are outside my alert radius.

IMHO not having the GC new/changed information in the morning GCA email would diminish it's value. Not to the point I would no longer read it or support the site, but it would still be a loss. Why do we include GC information currently? Because the members find it useful.


28 April 12 7:35 pm
Profile E-mail
5500 or more caches found
5500 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 17 August 09 10:44 am
Posts: 1730
Location: Sydney, NSW
GCA Found: 1182
GCA Hidden: 72
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
Ive managed to keep quiet (for once :P) on the issue but now I think a good resolution is proposed I shall voice agreement. I like the proposed C@W solution, except as Richay pointed out to remove ALL GC stuff off the mailout as I too find it a useful service (when Im at home... or for stalking purposes over here :P) If we just remove the Mega Reference out of the email, the organisers will be protected and everyone else still gets 99.9% of the info they like for new GCA and GC caches :)


29 April 12 12:07 am
Profile E-mail
3000 or more caches found
3000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 25 February 09 1:59 pm
Posts: 1588
Location: West Ryde
GCA Found: 1459
GCA Hidden: 59
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
Zalgariath wrote:
Ive managed to keep quiet (for once :P) on the issue but now I think a good resolution is proposed I shall voice agreement. I like the proposed C@W solution, except as Richay pointed out to remove ALL GC stuff off the mailout as I too find it a useful service (when Im at home... or for stalking purposes over here :P) If we just remove the Mega Reference out of the email, the organisers will be protected and everyone else still gets 99.9% of the info they like for new GCA and GC caches :)

Yes, I agree with this.


29 April 12 9:23 pm
Profile
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
Posts: 1904
GCA Found: 123
GCA Hidden: 0
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
Finally got a response but c@w already has it covered.


01 May 12 12:28 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 24 December 06 4:18 pm
Posts: 955
Location: Canberra
GCA Found: 345
GCA Hidden: 0
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"


02 May 12 11:53 am
Profile
1400 or more caches found
1400 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 13 March 07 10:32 am
Posts: 649
Location: Hobart
GCA Found: 132
GCA Hidden: 4
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: Groundspeak "listing-service exclusivity on Mega-Events"
Bewilderbeest wrote:
Regarding the daily emailer, others have suggested removing mega-event info only and leaving other GC content, to maintain usefulness. At the risk of opening a new can of worms, it is not unheard-of for non-Mega events to be sponsored. Therefore, to avoid potential issues in future I suggest removing all GC events from the emailer (if the proposal to remove all GC content doesnt go ahead) (noting that the solicitation guideline means this issue is unlikely to occur with other cache types).


Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original impetus for this discussion was Groundspeak's own Mega-event specific requirement for "listing exclusivity". (i.e., not sponsorship, per se, nor events other than Megas). [I confess I've lost track of the arguments. However, I like all that's in the GCA daily email, and if wiser heads than mine feel that we're not risking anything to organisers of events (which I think c@w had as his main concern, as opposed to just an "our site vs their site" argument which has also come into the discussion) then I'd prefer to keep things as close to as they are as possible. YMMV. IMHNC*.)

* I May Have No Clue


02 May 12 3:40 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Forum theme by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.