Garmin Chirp

For all your general chit chat, caching or not.
User avatar
theUMP
Posts: 419
Joined: 16 February 06 8:15 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by theUMP » 17 October 10 3:05 pm

The good folk at Groundspeak have been caught out by this announcement, as Garmin never said a word about it to them! (And how dumb is that? It could've been launched with a new attribute or cache type and taken off immediately. And I thought they were BFF!)

So, they're thinking about how best to handle it. The requirement for a specific brand of GPSr is a problem under the commercial caches guideline, so the work-around is to have an alternative waypoint as well that doesn't need the Garmin. For a FINAL container, there's no argument: you still need a logbook. If all you have is a Chirp at GZ, you don't have a geocache that'll be published on GC.com

User avatar
CraigRat
850 or more found!!!
850 or more found!!!
Posts: 7015
Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Twitter: CraigRat
Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
Location: Launceston, TAS
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by CraigRat » 17 October 10 3:14 pm

theUMP wrote:The good folk at Groundspeak have been caught out by this announcement, as Garmin never said a word about it to them! (And how dumb is that? It could've been launched with a new attribute or cache type and taken off immediately. And I thought they were BFF!)
It's quite a head scratcher.

Given it's been allegedly developed specifically for Geocaching, it's a bit odd that they released it all on their own (unless theres something else around the corner we are all unaware of).

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17015
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by caughtatwork » 17 October 10 4:02 pm

theUMP wrote:The good folk at Groundspeak have been caught out by this announcement, as Garmin never said a word about it to them! (And how dumb is that? It could've been launched with a new attribute or cache type and taken off immediately. And I thought they were BFF!)
CraigRat wrote:I wonder if it's co-incidental that at the same time with the new Chirp update in my Oregon (4.1) that the Icon is now a generic cache rather than the GC logo?
Together, this is very strange. I have never updated my firmware, but I did this afternoon and happened to notice the same thing. It's now a brown treasure box. I enjoy a good conspiracy theory, so I wonder what prompted Chirp and the change of icon? Maybe a lovers tiff?

User avatar
gmj3191
7500 or more caches found
7500 or more caches found
Posts: 1316
Joined: 22 April 03 12:37 am
Location: Sandringham, Vic Garmin Oregon 650

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by gmj3191 » 17 October 10 5:42 pm

It will be interesting to see whether Garmin make the CHIRP wireless protocol available to other GPS manufacturers so that they can eventually "hear" it too.
If others develop their own proprietary protocols and devices we'll have a helluva mess. In the meantime the easy CHIRP alternative to another clue method is a good idea to keep things moving.

User avatar
Zytheran
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 961
Joined: 19 May 04 12:08 am
Location: Adelaide, Newton

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by Zytheran » 17 October 10 6:23 pm

Big Matt and Shell wrote:That is very cool, it will be a while before I can use it though. The Oregon 300 we have only has about 2500 finds on it and I won't be reinvesting another $1000 in a hurry just yet...
It would appear Oregon 300 supports this feature. I noticed it in the latest software upload.
In the settings menu I can turn 'chirp searching on' and 'Program chirp'

User avatar
Zytheran
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
Posts: 961
Joined: 19 May 04 12:08 am
Location: Adelaide, Newton

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by Zytheran » 17 October 10 6:35 pm

CraigRat wrote:
theUMP wrote:The good folk at Groundspeak have been caught out by this announcement, as Garmin never said a word about it to them! (And how dumb is that? It could've been launched with a new attribute or cache type and taken off immediately. And I thought they were BFF!)
It's quite a head scratcher.

Given it's been allegedly developed specifically for Geocaching, it's a bit odd that they released it all on their own (unless theres something else around the corner we are all unaware of).
Geocaching?? Oh, OK. #-o
I thought it had been developed for hiding weapon stockpiles, locked drug stashes in the city and to help the espionage industry?
Geocaching? Who'd have thunk?
What a fantastic device for terrorists our brave soldiers.

User avatar
CraigRat
850 or more found!!!
850 or more found!!!
Posts: 7015
Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Twitter: CraigRat
Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
Location: Launceston, TAS
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by CraigRat » 17 October 10 7:07 pm

Zytheran wrote: Geocaching?? Oh, OK. #-o
I thought it had been developed for hiding weapon stockpiles, locked drug stashes in the city and to help the espionage industry?
Geocaching? Who'd have thunk?
What a fantastic device for terrorists our brave soldiers.
:lol:

Would have been cool if this was some kind of 'beacon' rather than a hi tech way of doing what you can do with a film cannister and a piece of paper!

User avatar
Big Matt and Shell
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
Posts: 1905
Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
Twitter: BigMattandShell
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by Big Matt and Shell » 17 October 10 7:32 pm

Philipp wrote:If you go to the German garmin site it tells you which devices work with Chirp:

Dakota 20, Oregon 300/400t/450/450t/550/550t, GPSMAP 62s/62st, GPSMAP 78s

cheers
Thanks for that, I hadn't bothered digging after reading the earlier post.

User avatar
Map Monkey
1050 or more caches found
1050 or more caches found
Posts: 2214
Joined: 08 April 04 3:06 pm
Location: Banana Republic
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by Map Monkey » 17 October 10 8:09 pm

CraigRat wrote:
Zytheran wrote: Geocaching?? Oh, OK. #-o
I thought it had been developed for hiding weapon stockpiles, locked drug stashes in the city and to help the espionage industry?
Geocaching? Who'd have thunk?
What a fantastic device for terrorists our brave soldiers.
:lol:

Would have been cool if this was some kind of 'beacon' rather than a hi tech way of doing what you can do with a film cannister and a piece of paper!
Who's kidnapped the real CR? Are you hearing yourself? [-X :P

If they don't kiss and make up soon, there may be an opportunity for GCA to buy 100,000 of these units for next to nothing. \:D/ ..... unless we don't like Garmin either :twisted:

mm

User avatar
CraigRat
850 or more found!!!
850 or more found!!!
Posts: 7015
Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
Twitter: CraigRat
Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
Location: Launceston, TAS
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by CraigRat » 17 October 10 8:24 pm

I'm trying to find an 'in' within the software people right now to get them to support our GPX and Opencaching's GPX formats. If anyone has a contact within Garmins Tech area, I'd LOVE to hear form you!

Strike while the iron's hot!

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17015
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by caughtatwork » 18 October 10 8:42 pm

Map Monkey wrote:If they don't kiss and make up soon, there may be an opportunity for GCA to buy 100,000 of these units for next to nothing. \:D/ ..... unless we don't like Garmin either :twisted:
mm
We love Garmin (well I do now that 4.00 has multi cache support for my Orgeon 450).
100,000 might be a bit out of price capability, but I would love to get a few down here in Australia.
I'm sure we can think of some way to use them at Geocaching Australia :mrgreen:

tatty
Posts: 120
Joined: 05 August 03 7:29 pm
Location: mornington peninsula

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by tatty » 19 October 10 5:05 am

A new development overnight, was posted by MissJenn (admin at GS)
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index. ... 19&st=150#
Groundspeak will make it easier to have these new devices as part of the growing repertoire of ways to find a cache.

Here is the current plan:
1) A new attribute for a "beacon" will be added soon. Any caches that use a Chirp (or any future similar device) should use this attribute.
2) If a cache owner puts a beacon in a traditional cache and geocachers have an alternative method to find it without using the beacon, then OK. I remind you to use the coming attribute.
3) If the cache owner insists on not providing an alternative means of finding the geocache, it must be listed as a mystery with the beacon attribute.
4) Cache descriptions may mention the "Chirp" as long as the text doesn't go on and on with "overtones of advertising, marketing, or promotion" as per our long-standing commercial guidelines.
5) We do not plan to add a new cache type just for this.
And a few posts further down from Jeremy
Garmin didn't tell us about this product. We only became aware of it, by accident, two days prior to the public announcement.

Because we had no prior knowledge of the device being released, we have been figuring out how to make them available within Geocaching.com. We'll be supporting them as a new attribute which should be available as early as today.
So it looks like it is finally sorted.

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17015
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by caughtatwork » 19 October 10 7:56 am

Geocaching Australia started supporting these devices, and other related devices, yesterday as a new cache type (which they should be).
http://wiki.geocaching.com.au/wiki/Beacon_Cache

User avatar
riblit
It's the journey.
It's the journey.
Posts: 3444
Joined: 04 April 03 6:30 pm
Location: Land Grant of John Campbell

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by riblit » 19 October 10 12:17 pm

If you check the cache attributes, a new one has been added under Equipment, Wireless Beacon.

That's one Jeremy alluded to.

User avatar
caughtatwork
Posts: 17015
Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Garmin Chirp

Post by caughtatwork » 19 October 10 1:09 pm

Oh, that's a bit boring, really. I think I like the new cache type better (obviously).
We were going to call it a "Signal" cache, but we put that idea aside for obvious reasons :mrgreen:

Post Reply