View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently 15 December 17 11:08 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
NZ 
Author Message

Joined: 30 June 10 12:02 pm
Posts: 2
Location: Cranendonck, NB Netherlands
GCA Found:
GCA Hidden:
Post NZ
I am look for some Gecachers from New Zeeland.
I found a COIN and this must travel to new Zeeland
"Janneke was my colleague at the Alexander Roozendaalschool in Amsterdam. Janneke is moved to New Zealand. She is an avid cacher." its from date Wednesday, 13 October 2010 And 2011 October found it in The netherlands.
http://www.geocaching.com/track/details.aspx?guid=2022d5db-a970-4c21-9990-07f5beb77750
So who In New Zeeland can place it tere? Send me a Email of forum PM.

Greets Dragon-Boy


04 October 11 10:36 am
Profile E-mail WWW
50 or more caches found
50 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 14 July 08 10:53 pm
Posts: 321
Location: Redlands, QLD
GCA Found: 71
GCA Hidden: 7
Post Re: NZ
Dragon Boy,

Try this site, where you will find a NZ cacher or two. :mrgreen:

forums.gps.org.nz


04 October 11 9:01 pm
Profile

Joined: 30 June 10 12:02 pm
Posts: 2
Location: Cranendonck, NB Netherlands
GCA Found:
GCA Hidden:
Post Re: NZ
Thank you is done =D>

GhostGums wrote:
Dragon Boy,

Try this site, where you will find a NZ cacher or two. :mrgreen:

forums.gps.org.nz


04 October 11 9:27 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 22 April 03 12:37 am
Posts: 1307
Location: Sandringham, Vic Garmin Oregon 650
GCA Found: 149
GCA Hidden: 10
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Why is it that NZ caches have the area in brackets after the cache name?
eg.
Cavers Delight (Fiordland)
Stumped (Southland)
Rigney (Central Otago)

Do the gc.com reviewers add this?
If so, why in New Zealand and not in, Australia for instance?


17 December 12 12:33 am
Profile E-mail
6500 or more caches found
6500 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 11 February 07 9:53 pm
Posts: 1904
GCA Found: 123
GCA Hidden: 0
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
In the early days GC.com only had one state (NZ) for all New Zealand caches. My understanding is that this was done to allow people to easily look at the list of new caches in the search screen and allow them to spot caches nearby.

I think the reviewers were adding them initially but can not comment for now.


17 December 12 9:24 am
Profile E-mail WWW
5500 or more caches found
5500 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 17 August 09 10:44 am
Posts: 1736
Location: Sydney, NSW
GCA Found: 1197
GCA Hidden: 73
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Yes I found that uniformity odd too! New players probably see it on all the caches and think it is the thing to do so all caches end up with it. I like it :)


18 December 12 12:08 am
Profile E-mail
10000 or more caches found
10000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 12 December 10 9:12 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Pearsall WA
GCA Found: 977
GCA Hidden: 56
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Worked really well for us when visiting for the MEGA recently. but there was a thread elsewhere about it. Saw it before we travelled.


23 December 12 12:10 am
Profile E-mail
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14676
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 298
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
gmj3191 wrote:
Why is it that NZ caches have the area in brackets after the cache name?
eg.
Cavers Delight (Fiordland)
Stumped (Southland)
Rigney (Central Otago)

Do the gc.com reviewers add this?
If so, why in New Zealand and not in, Australia for instance?

They appear to be Regional Councils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southland_Region as an example. There are only 15 regions in NZ. As far as I can tell there are no regional councils in Australia. There are only local government areas (formally). There are around 600 LGA's in Australia. I'd guess that assigning an LGA to each cache in Australia would be too onerous on the reviewers. It also appears that the regions in NZ are very stable in terms of boundaries. LGA's in Australia change. Not frequently, but frequently enough to be a pain in the ass.


23 December 12 10:51 am
Profile E-mail WWW
6000 or more caches found
6000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Waitara, Sydney
GCA Found: 1297
GCA Hidden: 23
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
I think it was just a done thing in the early days that has propagated. AFAIK the reviewers weren't adding it as I have found one or two that didn't have it.

Personally on my few trips to NZ I didn't find it that useful, but that may be because I had no idea where the boundaries were. Also an "area" can cover quite a distance even in NZ so as a filtering tool I don't think it would be that helpful.

I would rather just load into GSAK on the laptop or Geosphere on the iPhone and look for what is in range, the location name is irrelevant.


24 December 12 11:57 pm
Profile E-mail
2000 or more caches found
2000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 24 December 06 4:18 pm
Posts: 955
Location: Canberra
GCA Found: 345
GCA Hidden: 0
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
caughtatwork wrote:
gmj3191 wrote:
Why is it that NZ caches have the area in brackets after the cache name?
eg.
Cavers Delight (Fiordland)
Stumped (Southland)
Rigney (Central Otago)

Do the gc.com reviewers add this?
If so, why in New Zealand and not in, Australia for instance?

They appear to be Regional Councils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southland_Region as an example. There are only 15 regions in NZ. As far as I can tell there are no regional councils in Australia. There are only local government areas (formally). There are around 600 LGA's in Australia. I'd guess that assigning an LGA to each cache in Australia would be too onerous on the reviewers. It also appears that the regions in NZ are very stable in terms of boundaries. LGA's in Australia change. Not frequently, but frequently enough to be a pain in the ass.

There are also areas in Australia that are not part of an LGA.


04 February 13 8:47 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14676
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 298
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Bewilderbeest wrote:
caughtatwork wrote:
gmj3191 wrote:
Why is it that NZ caches have the area in brackets after the cache name?
eg.
Cavers Delight (Fiordland)
Stumped (Southland)
Rigney (Central Otago)

Do the gc.com reviewers add this?
If so, why in New Zealand and not in, Australia for instance?

They appear to be Regional Councils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southland_Region as an example. There are only 15 regions in NZ. As far as I can tell there are no regional councils in Australia. There are only local government areas (formally). There are around 600 LGA's in Australia. I'd guess that assigning an LGA to each cache in Australia would be too onerous on the reviewers. It also appears that the regions in NZ are very stable in terms of boundaries. LGA's in Australia change. Not frequently, but frequently enough to be a pain in the ass.

There are also areas in Australia that are not part of an LGA.

Oooh, oooh, oooh, you got an example?


04 February 13 8:54 am
Profile E-mail WWW
User avatar

Joined: 08 October 03 8:00 pm
Posts: 1767
Location: Sydney
GCA Found: 153
GCA Hidden: 15
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Here's NSW - http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/dlg/dlghome/dlg_regions.asp


04 February 13 5:39 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
6000 or more caches found
6000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 04 February 04 10:55 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Waitara, Sydney
GCA Found: 1297
GCA Hidden: 23
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Bewilderbeest wrote:
caughtatwork wrote:
gmj3191 wrote:
Why is it that NZ caches have the area in brackets after the cache name?
eg.
Cavers Delight (Fiordland)
Stumped (Southland)
Rigney (Central Otago)

Do the gc.com reviewers add this?
If so, why in New Zealand and not in, Australia for instance?

They appear to be Regional Councils. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southland_Region as an example. There are only 15 regions in NZ. As far as I can tell there are no regional councils in Australia. There are only local government areas (formally). There are around 600 LGA's in Australia. I'd guess that assigning an LGA to each cache in Australia would be too onerous on the reviewers. It also appears that the regions in NZ are very stable in terms of boundaries. LGA's in Australia change. Not frequently, but frequently enough to be a pain in the ass.

There are also areas in Australia that are not part of an LGA.


Head out towards areas outside Broken Hill, they are part of an "Unincorporated Area" and services looked after by a different State Government department whose name I can't remember now.

Also, if we did add part of the LGA name to a cache having "My Cache (Richmond)" could confuse people when Richmond is an outer suburb of Sydney (and part of Hawkesbury Council) while Richmond River Shire Council is based around Casino in the north of the state. Only about 8 hours drive away.


04 February 13 10:32 pm
Profile E-mail
User avatar

Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
Posts: 14676
Location: Melbourne
GCA Found: 1041
GCA Hidden: 298
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds1000 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
Unincorporated NSW
http://geocaching.com.au/zone/view/2079
:mrgreen:


04 February 13 10:46 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
5000 or more caches found
5000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 22 April 03 12:37 am
Posts: 1307
Location: Sandringham, Vic Garmin Oregon 650
GCA Found: 149
GCA Hidden: 10
100 GCA Finds
Post Re: NZ
It would also help to differentiate caches like .... A Walk in The Park we have 7 of those in AU.
Bridge over Troubled Water(s) 6 of those

etc


04 February 13 10:58 pm
Profile E-mail
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Forum theme by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.