View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently 29 May 17 9:13 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600? 
Author Message

Joined: 11 February 16 11:34 am
Posts: 1
Location: South Australia
GCA Found:
GCA Hidden:
Post Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
I'm in the market for my first GPSr and would prefer a touch screen option. I'm tossing up between the eTrex Touch 35 and the Oregon.
As the Touch is a new product on the market I'm concerned that it may still have a few bugs which Garmin is still sorting with updates. However, I also like the idea that the Touch is new and would be more of the latest features. The Orgeon 600 (from what I've read) appears to have less bugs as it's an older model with a more stable platform.
Has anyone used both and can give me any advice?
TIA.


11 February 16 12:17 pm
Profile E-mail
3000 or more caches found
3000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 21 January 06 9:53 pm
Posts: 1150
Location: A little hill on the bright side of Brizzy
GCA Found: 29
GCA Hidden: 1
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
I'm looking at the same options, any update on your final choice.


02 May 16 10:25 pm
Profile E-mail
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found

Joined: 15 June 12 9:42 am
Posts: 98
Location: SE Melbourne
GCA Found:
GCA Hidden:
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
Garmin's website makes it easy to compare different models' specifications. On the specs alone, the Touch 35 wins. It has more than twice the amount of built-in memory and most other aspects are pretty much equal. The Oregon 600 has better screen resolution. https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/catalog/product/compareResult.ep?compareProduct=156873&compareProduct=113532 If you click the Blue button labelled "Show Only Differences" on the page that I've linked to, the comparison will be made much easier.


03 May 16 11:21 am
Profile E-mail
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 26 September 14 11:13 pm
Posts: 556
Location: Sydney, Australia
GCA Found: 661
GCA Hidden: 38
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
I went with the Oregon 650 and it's going well so far but there was a bit of a learning curve (I'm still on it actually). Love having a camera in the unit!


03 May 16 2:04 pm
Profile E-mail
3000 or more caches found
3000 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 21 January 06 9:53 pm
Posts: 1150
Location: A little hill on the bright side of Brizzy
GCA Found: 29
GCA Hidden: 1
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
Interesting , thanks for your responses, BTW how good are the photographs?


03 May 16 8:40 pm
Profile E-mail
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 26 September 14 11:13 pm
Posts: 556
Location: Sydney, Australia
GCA Found: 661
GCA Hidden: 38
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
Photos are good enough for me to be used in cache logs.
https://flic.kr/p/GqzDdC (image wouldn't embed in the post)
Just not great in low light although it does have a flash.


04 May 16 2:54 pm
Profile E-mail
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 26 September 14 11:13 pm
Posts: 556
Location: Sydney, Australia
GCA Found: 661
GCA Hidden: 38
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
I take that back about the low light photography. I just found some unlisted survey markers and used the 650 to capture them (I sound like I'm playing Pokemon Go already). The flash was intelegent enough to put out a pre-light to gauge distance, it then focused correctly and then took the image. Here's one of them - https://flic.kr/p/FVGp8C. They do seem to be on the warm colour side though.


04 May 16 11:15 pm
Profile E-mail
2500 or more caches found
2500 or more caches found

Joined: 15 June 12 9:42 am
Posts: 98
Location: SE Melbourne
GCA Found:
GCA Hidden:
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
ziggiau wrote:
I take that back about the low light photography. I just found some unlisted survey markers and used the 650 to capture them (I sound like I'm playing Pokemon Go already). The flash was intelegent enough to put out a pre-light to gauge distance, it then focused correctly and then took the image. Here's one of them - https://flic.kr/p/FVGp8C. They do seem to be on the warm colour side though.


My caching partner has been using an Oregon 650 for a couple of years. He finds that using the camera, with or without flash, drains the batteries noticeably quickly. Is that also your experience?


05 May 16 6:55 am
Profile E-mail
1550 or more caches found
1550 or more caches found
User avatar

Joined: 26 September 14 11:13 pm
Posts: 556
Location: Sydney, Australia
GCA Found: 661
GCA Hidden: 38
100 GCA Finds500 GCA Finds
Post Re: Garmin eTrex Touch 35 or Oregon 600?
I'm not sure I've used that combo enough to comment (I usually take photos with the phone, especially on those occasions when a GPS is required in a photo), but it makes sense that using a high power usage thing like a flash would affect battery life.


05 May 16 12:42 pm
Profile E-mail
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Forum theme by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.