Until Thursday of this week I had found 124 GCA caches in NSW for 2010 but that figure dropped to 122 on Friday without any input from me.
The GCA Query generator doesn't allow for finds to be searched for a particular year that I can see.
Is there a way I can search finds based on the year?
Could you explain why my found count decreased & how I might locate & restore the missing ones?
Are owners of GCA caches able to delete finds?
At some stage in my wanderings around this site I found an archive of all logs, including logs that had since been deleted. I could see where someone had written a log then at a later stage deleted that log (based on a search of the cache). Do you know where I can find this archive?
Thanks
Find Statistics
- CraigRat
- 850 or more found!!!
- Posts: 7015
- Joined: 23 August 04 3:17 pm
- Twitter: CraigRat
- Facebook: http://facebook.com/CraigRat
- Location: Launceston, TAS
- Contact:
Re: Find Statistics
Not quite yet, so that wouldn't be the reason (this 'feature' is coming VERY soon, and whent they do reject your log you will get an email so you know about it)Tuena wrote:Are owners of GCA caches able to delete finds?
Perhaps it could be 2 movables that are no longer in NSW?
- caughtatwork
- Posts: 17016
- Joined: 17 May 04 12:11 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Find Statistics
I think it's this cache.
http://geocaching.com.au/cache/ga1920
You found it twice in NSW.
The last move was http://geocaching.com.au/log/2703783 from NSW to WA.
As the cache is now in WA, it counts as a WA find.
http://geocaching.com.au/cache/ga1920
You found it twice in NSW.
The last move was http://geocaching.com.au/log/2703783 from NSW to WA.
As the cache is now in WA, it counts as a WA find.
Re: Find Statistics
Thanks once again - it was good to see Bundy's moveable travel such a long distance.
-
- 800 or more hollow logs searched
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 22 March 08 5:55 pm
- Twitter: m_ratt
- Location: Harrison, ACT
Re: Find Statistics
Glad I could move it such a distance. Sorry it caused you confusion.Tuena wrote:Thanks once again - it was good to see Bundy's moveable travel such a long distance.